<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>ar979</ui>
   <ji>ARJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Meeting abstract</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>The use of interferon-alfa in Beh&#231;et's disease: review of the literature</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>K&#246;tter</snm>
               <fnm>I</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>G&#252;naydin</snm>
               <fnm>I</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Zierhut</snm>
               <fnm>M</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>St&#252;biger</snm>
               <fnm>N</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>University Hospital, Dept. of Internal Medicine II and Ophthalmology II, T&#252;bingen, Germany</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Arthritis Res Ther</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>1st Workshop of the International Society for Beh&#231;et's Disease (ISBD) on Pathophysiology and Treatment of Beh&#231;et's Disease</p>
            </title>
            <editor>S Assaad-Khalil, H Direskeneli, M Schirmer</editor>
            <sponsor>
               <note>This workshop was supported in part by Merck Austria and the Scientific Society of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Innsbruck Austria</note>
            </sponsor>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
            <url>http://arthritis-research.com/supplements/notes/ar-5-s2-info.pdf</url>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>1st Workshop of the International Society for Beh&#231;et's Disease (ISBD) on Pathophysiology and Treatment of Beh&#231;et's Disease</p>
            </title>
            <location>K&#252;htai, Austria</location>
            <date-range>2&#8211;5 April 2003</date-range>
            <url>http://www.behcet.ws</url>
         </conference>
         <issn>1478-6354</issn>
         <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
         <volume>5</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 2</issue>
         <fpage>4</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar979</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>9</day>
               <month>9</month>
               <year>2003</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Objective</p>
         </st>
         <p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon-alfa for the treatment of Beh&#231;et's disease and discuss its possible mechanisms of action.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>Reports published until July 2002 in all languages were identified by the PubMed database and the Beh&#231;et's disease conference proceedings and abstract booklets. The indexing items used were Beh&#231;et and interferon.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Thirty-two original reports and four selected abstracts were included in the analysis. Systemic IFN-alfa was administered to 405 patients. Two hundred and sixteen patients with acute ocular disease were treated with IFN-alfa. Two hundred and ninety eight patients received IFN-alfa2a and 141 IFN-alfa2b. 85.6% of the patients with mucocutaneous symptoms, 95.8% with arthritis and 95.6% with uveitis exhibited a partial or complete response. Higher IFN doses were more effective than low dose regimens and led up to 56% long term remissions after discontinuation of IFN-alfa. IFN-alfa2a apparently was superior to IFN-alfa2b with more complete remissions, but this probably was due to a bias caused by the larger number of patients treated with IFN-alfa2a. Side effects were dose dependent and similar to those occurring in patients with hepatitis C.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusions</p>
         </st>
         <p>Although the comparability of the studies is hampered due to different study designs, it can be concluded that IFN-alfa is effective for the treatment of BD. It was effective even in resistant posterior uveitis, where long-term remissions with preservation of visual acuity could be achieved. In contrast, for mucocutaneous symptoms, only partial remissions were reported.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
</art>
