Biomechanical factors and physical examination findings in osteoarthritis of the knee: associations with tissue abnormalities assessed by conventional radiography and high-resolution 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

ar4050 1478-6354 Research article Biomechanical factors and physical examination findings in osteoarthritis of the knee: associations with tissue abnormalities assessed by conventional radiography and high-resolution 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging KnoopJesperj.knoop@reade.nl DekkerJoostj.dekker@vumc.nl KleinJan-Pauljp.klein@vumc.nl van der LeedenMarikem.vd.leeden@reade.nl van der EschMartinm.vd.esch@reade.nl ReidingDickd.reiding@reade.nl VoornemanERamonr.voorneman@reade.nl GerritsenMartijnm.gerritsen@reade.nl RoordaDLeol.roorda@reade.nl SteultjensPMMartijnmartijn.steultjens@gcu.ac.uk LemsFWillemw.lems@reade.nl

Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center - Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, 1056 AB Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine/EMGO, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Jan van Breemen Research Institute - Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, 1056 AB Amsterdam, the Netherlands

School of Health and Life Sciences, Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK

Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Arthritis Research & Therapy 1478-6354 2012 14 5 R212 http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/5/R212 10.1186/ar405023039323 752012296201251020125102012 2012Knoop et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to explore the associations between knee osteoarthritis (OA)-related tissue abnormalities assessed by conventional radiography (CR) and by high-resolution 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as biomechanical factors and findings from physical examination in patients with knee OA.

Methods

This was an explorative cross-sectional study of 105 patients with knee OA. Index knees were imaged using CR and MRI. Multiple features from CR and MRI (cartilage, osteophytes, bone marrow lesions, effusion and synovitis) were related to biomechanical factors (quadriceps and hamstrings muscle strength, proprioceptive accuracy and varus-valgus laxity) and physical examination findings (bony tenderness, crepitus, bony enlargement and palpable warmth), using multivariable regression analyses.

Results

Quadriceps weakness was associated with cartilage integrity, effusion, synovitis (all detected by MRI) and CR-detected joint space narrowing. Knee joint laxity was associated with MRI-detected cartilage integrity, CR-detected joint space narrowing and osteophyte formation. Multiple tissue abnormalities including cartilage integrity, osteophytes and effusion, but only those detected by MRI, were found to be associated with physical examination findings such as crepitus.

Conclusion

We observed clinically relevant findings, including a significant association between quadriceps weakness and both effusion and synovitis, detected by MRI. Inflammation was detected in over one-third of the participants, emphasizing the inflammatory component of OA and a possible important role for anti-inflammatory therapies in knee OA. In general, OA-related tissue abnormalities of the knee, even those detected by MRI, were found to be discordant with biomechanical and physical examination features.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee involves many tissues of the knee joint, not only addressing cartilage but also including abnormalities in subchondral bone and the synovial membrane 12. Most people with knee OA suffer from pain, stiffness and limitations in daily activities 2. Physical examination may reveal clinical signs such as joint crepitus, swelling, deformities or increased warmth of the joint 2. Additionally, biomechanical factors such as lower limb muscle strength, proprioceptive accuracy of the knee joint and varus-valgus knee joint laxity, which are considered essential factors for knee stabilization 345, have frequently been found to be impaired in knee OA patients 678. Besides being clinically important consequences of OA, biomechanical factors may also play a role in the onset of tissue abnormalities 9101112. Presumably, biomechanical factors in the knee joint and tissue abnormalities interact with each other during the disease process of OA.

Conventional radiography (CR) is the primary modality for disease diagnosis and classification in clinical practice 13. CR-based joint space width (JSW), an indirect measure for cartilage loss, is the most important outcome measure in pharmacological studies 14. In contrast to radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to visualize cartilage and to detect bone marrow lesions (BML) and inflammation (for example, effusion and synovitis) 14. MRI is therefore currently the best modality available for imaging OA-related tissue abnormalities 14 and may be able to unravel mechanisms underlying biomechanical impairments.

Only a few studies have been performed on the association between tissue abnormalities and biomechanical factors. While studies using CR provided mixed results 1516171819, studies using MRI clearly demonstrated an association between (medial tibiofemoral and patellafemoral compartmental) cartilage thickness and quadriceps strength 182021. A small number of studies (using CR or MRI) provided mixed results on the relationship between tissue abnormalities (namely, cartilage thickness 82223 and osteophyte formation 2224) and knee joint laxity, while proprioceptive accuracy and hamstrings muscles have never been studied in relation to tissue abnormalities.

Most studies concerning OA-related tissue abnormalities focused on the association with patient-reported pain or activity limitations, generally providing evidence for discordance - particularly in studies using CR 132526272829303132. OA-related tissue abnormalities are possibly more closely linked to findings from physical examination, rather than to self-reported outcomes. Recently, a population-based study using MRI showed that multiple tissue abnormalities were related to the presence of crepitus 33. As far as we know, tissue abnormalities have not so far been related to findings from physical examination in a knee OA population.

In conclusion, there is limited knowledge on the association between OA-related tissue abnormalities, biomechanical factors and physical examination findings in knee OA. The first aim of the present study was therefore to explore associations of CR-detected and MRI-detected tissue abnormalities and biomechanical factors (quadriceps and hamstrings muscle strength, proprioceptive accuracy and knee joint laxity) in patients with knee OA. The second aim was to explore associations of CR-detected and MRI-detected tissue abnormalities and physical examination findings (bony tenderness, crepitus, bony enlargement and palpable warmth) in patients with knee OA.

Materials and methods

Subjects

For the present study, participants were recruited from a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of a knee stabilization exercise program 34. Inclusion criteria were clinical knee OA diagnosis according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (that is, presence of knee pain and at least three of the following six items: age >50 years, morning stiffness <30 minutes, crepitus, bony tenderness, bony enlargement and no palpable warmth) 35, age between 40 and 75 years, instability of the knee and written informed consent. Total knee arthroplasty, rheumatoid arthritis or any other form of arthritis (that is, crystal arthropathy, septic arthritis, spondylarthropathy), comorbidities affecting daily functioning, severe knee pain (numeric rating scale >8) and/or contraindication for MRI (for example, pacemaker, claustrophobia) were exclusion criteria. Patients were subsequently examined by radiologists, rheumatologists, and physiatrists. The measurement protocol contained assessment of demographic, biomechanical and clinical factors related to OA, as well as CR and MRI, all assessed prior to the start of the trial. All participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Reade/Slotervaart Institutional Review Board.

Index knee

For knee-specific variables we used data from the index knee. For unilateral knee OA patients, the index knee was the knee that was diagnosed with clinical OA. For bilateral knee OA patients, the index knee was the knee that most severely affected daily activities on patient self-report.

Biomechanical factors

Measurements of lower limb muscle strength, proprioceptive accuracy and varus-valgus laxity have been extensively described in previous publications 53637. In summary, muscle strength was measured isokinetically (60°/second) for both knee extension (quadriceps) and flexion (hamstrings) strength. Strength outcomes (in Nm) were adjusted for bodyweight 36. For proprioceptive accuracy (knee joint motion sense), a threshold detection task was used - which assessed the amount of degrees after motion detection, with motion velocity of 0.3°/second 36. Varus-valgus knee joint laxity was measured as the total range of knee motion (in degrees) in the frontal plane. In a sitting position, the thigh and lower leg were fixed at five places to prevent for medial or lateral movement of the thigh and lower leg and for hip rotation. In a fixed knee flexion of 20°, a load of 1.12 kg (7.7 Nm) was applied to the lower leg both medially and laterally, resulting in varus or valgus movement across the transverse axis of the knee joint 37.

Physical examination findings

The following features from the American College of Rheumatology criteria for clinical knee OA diagnosis were assessed by the physiatrist on physical examination of the knee joint: bony tenderness (that is, pain by palpation at the joint line), crepitus (that is, crackling or grinding sound in the joint during weight bearing), bony enlargement at joint line and palpable warmth of the knee joint 35. Findings were scored as yes (present) or no (absent).

Radiography

Conventional radiographs of tibiofemoral joints were made by a weight-bearing posterioanterior view, semi-flexed (7 to 10°) according to Buckland-Wright and colleagues 38. Radiographs of patellofemoral joints were made by a single standing mediolateral view in 30° flexion, and a skyline (inferior superior) view in 30° flexion 39. Two independent observers (DR, MvdE) graded radiographs, unaware of the patient's clinical characteristics. One observer (DR) was a bone and joint radiologist, and the second observer (MvdE) was an epidemiologist trained by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The JSW and osteophyte formation were scored on a scale of 0 to 3, for medial tibiofemoral (MTF), lateral tibiofemoral (LTF) and patellafemoral (PF) compartments separately, according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas 40. Severity of structural damage in the knee, according to Kellgren-Lawrence 41, was also scored. The intraclass correlation coefficient for interrater reliability in 64 knees was 0.87 (P <0.001) for JSW, 0.60 (P <0.001) for osteophytes and 0.89 (P <0.001) for the Kellgren-Lawrence score.

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI scans of one knee (the index knee) were performed by a 3.0 Tesla whole-body magnetic resonance scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) using a phased array knee coil. The MRI examination included five scans. All scans were made with a field of view of 180 mm. The first sequence was a sagittal proton density-weighted turbo spin-echo with fat suppression (slice thickness 3 mm; interslice gap 0.3 mm; repetition time 3,480 milliseconds; echo time 42 milliseconds; turbo factor 8; matrix 384×256). The second sequence was a sagittal T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (slice thickness 3 mm; interslice gap 0.3 mm; repetition time 760 milliseconds; echo time 14 milliseconds; turbofactor 2; matrix 384×256). The third sequence was a coronal T2-weighted turbo spin-echo with fat suppression (slice thickness 3mm; interslice gap 0.3 mm; repetition time 5,800 milliseconds; echo time 85 milliseconds; turbo factor 15; matrix 384×256). The fourth sequence was a sagittal combined multi-echo gradient echo (thickness 3.5 mm; interslice gap 0.3 mm; repetition time 973 milliseconds; excitation angle 20°; matrix 352×224). The last sequence was a coronal combined multi-echo gradient echo (thickness 3.0 mm; interslice gap 0.5 mm; repetition time 854 milliseconds; excitation angle 20°; matrix 352×224).

MRI scans were assessed according to the Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score system 42, a semi-quantitative whole-joint scoring method. A radiologist (J-PK) with 27 years of musculoskeletal expertise, blinded to the patient's clinical characteristics and radiographic assessment, assessed all MRI scans. Cartilage integrity, osteophyte formation and BML were scored per region, with scores ranging from 0 (no abnormality) to 3 (severe abnormality). For effusion, one knee-specific score was used, ranging from 0 (physiological amount of effusion) to 3 (large effusion). Presence of synovitis (yes/no) was assessed in five regions separately. Specific details on MRI assessment are presented in Table 1. The intraclass correlation coefficient for intrarater reliability in 15 knees was found to be 0.83 (P <0.001) for cartilage thickness, 0.86 (P <0.001) for osteophytes, 0.91 (P <0.001) for BML, and 0.97 (P <0.001) for effusion. Cohen's kappa for synovitis was 0.73 (P = 0.003).

Table 1

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment, according to Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score 42

Cartilage integrity

Osteophytes

Bone marrow lesions

Effusion

Synovitis

Assessment

Size of any cartilage thickness loss (both partial and full thickness loss) as percentage of cartilage surface area of each region

Size of protuberance of osteophyte

Size of BML (including volume of any associated cysts) as percentage of bone volume of each region

Size of effusion within synovial space

Presence of synovitis

Region

Number

1 (one score for whole knee)

MTF

Medial weight-bearing femur

Medial region tibia

Medial posterior region femur

Medial region tibia

LTF

Lateral weight-bearing femur

lateral weight-bearing Femur

Lateral region tibia

Lateral posterior region femur

Lateral region tibia

Medial region patella

Superior region patella

Medial region patella

Lateral region patella

Inferior region patella

Lateral region patella

Medial trochlea femur

Medial region patella

Medial trochlea femur

Lateral trochlea femur

Lateral region patella

Lateral trochlea femur

Medial trochlea femur

Lateral trochlea femur

Other

Subspinous region tibia

Hoffa's fat pad (infrapatellar)

Medial posterior-condylar region

Lateral posterior-condylar region

Medial recess

Lateral recess

Score (per region)

0 = none

0 = physiological amount^a

0 = absent

1 = <10% of surface area

1 = mild

1 = <10% of bone volume

1 = small^b

1 = present

2 = 10 to 75% of surface area

2 = moderate

2 = 10 to 25% of bone volume

2 = medium^c

3 = >75% of surface area

3 = severe

3 = >25% of bone volume

3 = large^d

Details

An osteophyte must be visible on two consecutive slices. Largest osteophyte within region scored

If BML span more than one region, then full size of BML is attributed to region that is most involved

BML, bone marrow lesions; LTF, lateral tibiofemoral compartment; MTF, medial tibiofemoral compartment; PF, patellafemoral compartment. ^aIn supra-patellar bursa only. ^bFluid continuous in retropatellar space. ^cWith slight convexity of suprapatellar bursa. ^dEvidence of capsular distention.

Statistical analysis

Firstly, descriptive statistics were calculated. Secondly, linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for associations of tissue abnormalities (independent variables) with biomechanical factors and physical examination findings (dependent variables), for continuous and dichotomous scales respectively. Compartment-specific scores for JSW and osteophytes, detected by CR, were dichotomized by combining scores 0 and 1 (that is, only minute abnormality) and combining scores 2 and 3 (that is, at least definite abnormality) for each compartment separately. Region-specific scores (0 to 3) for cartilage integrity, osteophytes and BML, detected by MRI, were summed into compartment-specific scores 27434445. Knee-specific scores for MRI-based effusion were dichotomized, by combining scores 0 and 1 (physiological amount/small effusion) and by combining scores 2 and 3 (medium/large effusion) 2846. Region-specific scores for MRI-based synovitis were also dichotomized into one knee-specific score (no synovitis at all vs. synovitis present in at least one region). Regression analyses were performed univariably as well as multivariably with adjustment for age, gender and duration of knee symptoms. Standardized regression β coefficients and P values were estimated for linear regression analyses; odds ratios and P values were estimated for logistic regression analyses. Statistical significance was accepted at P <0.05. All analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

From a total of 112 potential candidates that participated in a randomized controlled trial 34 from January 2010, seven persons were excluded (because MRI could not be scheduled before the start of the trial). Patient characteristics of the study sample (n = 105) are presented in Table 2. In general, study participants demonstrated multiple severe tissue abnormalities, detected by both CR and MRI, indicating an advanced OA group. An overview of all study findings is presented in Table 3.

Table 2

Descriptive data of study population (n = 105)

Mean ± SD

n (%)

Demographics

Age (years)

61.4 ± 6.9

Gender (female)

73 (70)

Duration of knee complaints (years)

11.3 ± 9.3

Body mass index (kg/m²)

29.1 ± 4.7

Radiographic severity^a

K-L score 0/1

32 (31)

K-L score 2

28 (27)

K-L score 3

26 (25)

K-L score 4

19 (18)

Pain severity (NRS, 0 to 10)

5.1 ± 2.1

Biomechanical factors

Quadriceps muscle strength (Nm/kg)^a

0.89 ± 0.47

Hamstrings muscle strength (Nm/kg)^a

0.61 ± 0.26

Proprioceptive accuracy (degrees)^a

2.9 ± 1.9

Varus-valgus laxity (degrees)^a

6.9 ± 2.8

Physical examination findings

Bony tenderness (yes)^a

75 (71)

Crepitus (yes)^a

86 (82)

Bony enlargement (yes)^a

12 (11)

Palpable warmth (yes)^a

4 (4)

Tissue abnormalities, detected by CR

Median (range)

Joint space width^a

MTF (0, 1, 2, 3)^b

5, 29, 31, 40

LTF (0, 1, 2, 3)^b

68, 20, 10, 7

PF (0, 1, 2, 3)^b

31, 44, 22, 8

Osteophytes^a

MTF (0, 1, 2, 3)^c

21, 57, 24, 3

LTF (0, 1, 2, 3)^c

43, 49, 11, 2

PF (0, 1, 2, 3)^c

11, 67, 25, 2

Tissue abnormalities, detected by MRI

Cartilage integrity^a

MTF (0 to 6)

4 (0 to 6)

LTF (0 to 6)

2 (0 to 6)

PF (0 to 12)

2 (0 to 12)

Osteophytes^a

MTF (0 to 9)

3 (0 to 9)

LTF (0 to 9)

2 (0 to 9)

PF (0 to 18)

5 (0 to 12)

Bone marrow lesions^a

MTF (0 to 6)

1 (0 to 6)

LTF (0 to 6)

0 (0 to 6)

PF (0 to 12)

0 (0 to 8)

Effusion (0, 1, 2, 3)^a,d

34, 31, 27, 13

Synovitis^apresence, n (%)

In at least one region

36 (34)

In Hoffa's fat pad

31 (30)

In medial posterior-condylar region

13 (12)

In lateral posterior-condylar region

12 (11)

In medial recess

6 (6)

In lateral recess

7 (7)

CR, conventional radiography; K-L, Kellgren-Lawrence; LTF, lateral tibiofemoral compartment; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTF, medial tibiofemoral compartment; NRS: numeric rating scale; PF, patellafemoral compartment; SD, standard deviation. ^aData from index knee. ^b0 = none, 1 = minute narrowing (0 to 33%); 2 = definite narrowing (33 to 66%); 3 = ankylosis (66 to 99%). ^c0 = none, 1 = minute, 2 = definite, 3 = large. ^d0 = none, 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe.

Table 3

Summary of study findings (significant associations*)

Associations with MRI features

Associations with radiographic features

Biomechanical factors

Quadriceps strength

Cartilage integrity in PF compartment, effusion and synovitis associated with lower quadriceps strength

Joint space width in PF compartment associated with lower quadriceps strength

Hamstrings strength

Proprioceptive accuracy

Laxity

Cartilage integrity in MTF compartment associated with lower varus-valgus laxity

Joint space width in MTF compartment associated with lower varus-valgus laxity; joint space width in LTF compartment and osteophytes in LTF compartment associated with higher varus-valgus laxity

Physical examination findings

Bony tenderness

Crepitus

Cartilage integrity in LTF compartment, osteophytes in MTF, LTF and PF compartment and effusion associated with presence of crepitus

Bony enlargement

Palpable warmth

LTF, lateral tibiofemoral compartment; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTF, medial tibiofemoral compartment; PF, patellafemoral compartment. *P <0.05.

One feature from CR (JSW in the PF compartment) was found to be significantly associated with lower quadriceps strength (β = -0.18, P = 0.030), as shown in Table 4. Three CR features were related to varus-valgus laxity; namely, JSW (β = 0.26, P = 0.004) and osteophytes (β = 0.26, P = 0.005) in the LTF compartment related to higher laxity, and JSW in the MTF compartment related to lower laxity (β = -0.22, P = 0.016). Three MRI features were significantly associated with lower quadriceps strength - namely, cartilage integrity (that is, reduced cartilage thickness) in the PF compartment (β = -0.17, P = 0.041) (see Figure 1), effusion (β = -0.16, P = 0.049) and synovitis (β = -0.21, P = 0.011) (see Figure 2) - while a borderline significant association was found for MTF cartilage integrity (β = -0.15, P = 0.073). We also found an association between MRI-detected cartilage integrity in the MTF compartment and laxity (β = -0.22, P = 0.017).

Table 4

Regression analyses^aof association between tissue abnormalities detected by CR and/or MRI and biomechanical factors

Quadriceps strength (Nm/kg)

Hamstrings strength (Nm/kg)

Proprioceptive accuracy (degrees)

Varus-valgus laxity (degrees)

Conventional radiography

JSW^b

MTF

-0.12 (0.16)

0.02 (0.84)

-0.03 (0.78)

-0.22 (0.02)

LTF

-0.07 (0.37)

-0.03 (0.71)

-0.08 (0.42)

0.26 (<0.01)

-0.18 (0.03)

0.09 (0.28)

-0.03 (0.80)

-0.14 (0.13)

Osteophyte^b

MTF

-0.03 (0.69)

0.04 (0.66)

-0.10 (0.31)

0.07 (0.47)

LTF

-0.06 (0.51)

0.06 (0.46)

-0.05 (0.63)

0.26 (<0.01)

-0.09 (0.30)

0.06 (0.44)

-0.09 (0.38)

-0.08 (0.37)

Magnetic resonance imaging

Cartilage integrity

MTF

-0.15 (0.07)

0.00 (0.97)

0.11 (0.25)

-0.22 (0.02)

LTF

-0.05 (0.55)

0.09 (0.30)

0.05 (0.61)

0.07 (0.44)

-0.17 (0.04)

0.10 (0.24)

-0.02 (0.86)

-0.11 (0.23)

Osteophytes

MTF

-0.05 (0.56)

0.11 (0.18)

0.08 (0.43)

-0.08 (0.36)

LTF

-0.08 (0.33)

0.05 (0.58)

0.02 (0.88)

0.02 (0.87)

-0.12 (0.15)

-0.01 (0.95)

-0.03 (0.77)

-0.17 (0.06)

BML

MTF

0.03 (0.76)

0.12 (0.13)

0.16 (0.11)

-0.06 (0.48)

LTF

-0.05 (0.54)

0.12 (0.13)

-0.05 (0.62)

0.12 (0.18)

0.01 (0.91)

0.16 (0.06)

-0.17 (0.08)

-0.12 (0.19)

Effusion^c

-0.16 (0.05)

-0.08 (0.34)

0.11 (0.26)

0.08 (0.40)

Synovitis^d

-0.21 (0.01)

-0.11 (0.17)

0.03 (0.76)

-0.02 (0.83)

Data presented as standardized regression coefficient β (P value). Significant associations (P <0.05) in bold. BML, bone marrow lesion; CR, conventional radiography; JSW, joint space width; LTF, lateral tibiofemoral compartment; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTF, medial tibiofemoral compartment; PF: patellafemoral compartment. ^aAdjusted for age, gender and duration of knee symptoms. ^bDefinite/severe abnormality compared with none/mild abnormality (reference group). ^cMedium/large effusion compared with no/small effusion (reference group). ^dPresence of synovitis in at least one region compared with absence of synovitis (reference group).

Figure 1

Reduced cartilage integrity in the patellafemoral compartment

Reduced cartilage integrity in the patellafemoral compartment. Sagittal combined multi-echo gradient echo 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scan.

Figure 2

Infrapatellar synovitis

Infrapatellar synovitis. Fat-suppressed sagittal proton density-weighted turbo spin-echo 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scan.

No associations were found between features from CR and findings from physical examination, as shown in Table 5. On the contrary, multiple MRI features (that is, LTF cartilage integrity, osteophytes in MTF, LTF and PF compartments and effusion) were found to be significantly associated with crepitus, while the association with MTF cartilage integrity was of borderline significance (P = 0.050).

Table 5

Regression analyses^aof association between tissue abnormalities from CR and/or MRI and physical examination findings

Bony tenderness (presence)

Crepitus (presence)

Bony enlargement (presence)

Palpable warmth (presence)

Conventional radiography

JSW^b

MTF

0.90 (0.82)

2.13 (0.15)

2.22 (0.34)

0.44 (0.43)

LTF

0.96 (0.95)

4.24 (0.18)

1.70 (0.50)

n/a

1.80 (00.27)

1.15 (0.82)

3.09 (0.09)

2.72 (0.35)

Osteophytes^b

MTF

0.77 (0.59)

1.40 (0.58)

0.78 (0.74)

0.90 (0.93)

LTF

0.85 (0.81)

n/a

1.29 (0.80)

2.33 (0.53)

1.34 (0.58)

1.45 (0.56)

1.89 (0.34)

3.52 (0.23)

Magnetic resonance imaging

Cartilage integrity

MTF

0.89 (0.25)

1.25 (0.05)

1.18 (0.26)

0.92 (0.72)

LTF

0.88 (0.27)

1.61 (0.02)

1.26 (0.15)

0.75 (0.38)

1.03 (0.74)

1.07 (0.49)

0.94 (0.60)

1.30 (0.11)

Osteophytes

MTF

0.92 (0.32)

1.34 (0.02)

1.05 (0.69)

1.24 (0.31)

LTF

1.06 (0.60)

1.57 (0.01)

1.29 (0.08)

1.19 (0.48)

1.09 (0.20)

1.20 (0.04)

0.99 (0.90)

1.30 (0.17)

BML

MTF

0.97 (0.76)

1.16 (0.27)

1.01 (0.94)

1.04 (0.87)

LTF

0.91 (0.53)

1.38 (0.26)

1.45 (0.05)

1.03 (0.95)

0.84 (0.21)

1.73 (0.12)

0.66 (0.28)

1.29 (0.28)

Effusion^c

0.75 (0.52)

7.05 (0.01)

1.10 (0.89)

5.93 (0.14)

Synovitis^d

0.84 (0.70)

2.14 (0.21)

1.30 (0.70)

n/a

Data presented as odds ratio (P value). Significant associations (P <0.05) in bold. BML, bone marrow lesion; CR, conventional radiography; JSW, joint space width; LTF, lateral tibiofemoral compartment; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTF, medial tibiofemoral compartment; n/a, not applicable because of empty cells in analysis; PF: patellafemoral compartment. ^aAdjusted for age, gender and duration of knee symptoms. ^bDefinite/severe abnormality compared with none/mild abnormality (reference group). ^cMedium/large effusion compared with no/small effusion (reference group). ^dPresence of synovitis in at least one region compared with absence of synovitis (reference group).

Discussion

This is the first knee OA study exploring associations between multiple tissue abnormalities, biomechanical factors and physical examination findings. The study provided several clinically relevant findings. Firstly, the clinically relevant and new finding that high-resolution 3.0 Tesla MRI-detected effusion and synovitis, associated with quadriceps weakness. Secondly, several tissue abnormalities (that is, cartilage integrity, osteophytes and effusion), but only when detected by MRI, were found to be associated with the presence of crepitus. Thirdly, we found associations of cartilage integrity with quadriceps weakness and reduced varus-valgus laxity.

The present explorative study showed only a limited amount of significant associations, which indicates discordance between tissue abnormalities and clinical features in knee OA patients. The lack of significant associations between radiographic and clinical features is not surprising, as the discordance between radiographic and clinical OA 13 is well known and, at least partly, related to the heterogeneity of OA. However, since pain severity has been found to be more closely linked to MRI features than to CR features 47, we were surprised by the limited amount of significant associations between MRI features, biomechanical factors and physical examination findings.

High-resolution MRI and CR provided similar patterns of association. Firstly, reduced PF cartilage integrity, both MRI based and CR based, was associated with quadriceps weakness, which confirms previous studies 182021. Secondly, MRI-based and CR-based MTF cartilage integrity loss was related to lower varus-valgus laxity. Although these associations were weak and inconsistent with previous studies 82223, they might be indicative for an ankylosing effect of end-stage cartilage integrity (that is, reduced joint motion due to bone-to-bone) 48. Others suggested that cartilage loss results in higher laxity due to reduced tension on ligaments (pseudo-laxity 8), which might underlie our finding of reduced LTF cartilage integrity (but only on CR) associated with higher laxity. Future studies are needed to clarify the association between cartilage integrity and laxity. Thirdly, neither features from MRI nor from CR were significantly related to hamstrings strength and proprioceptive accuracy. Finally, no associations were found between tissue abnormalities (MRI and CR) and physical examination findings (except for crepitus), which might, at least partly, be explained by the low proportion of persons with bony enlargement (11%) or palpable warmth (4%) in our cohort. These similar patterns of findings from CR and MRI were determined in a study sample of patients with advanced knee OA with knee complaints for more than 10 years on average. Since MRI is able to detect tissue abnormalities at a much earlier stage of the disease than CR 31, a different pattern of associations with clinical features may possibly be found in an early OA sample. On the other hand, two results from our study may be indicative for an additional value of MRI over CR. Firstly, MRI-based effusion and synovitis, which cannot be detected by CR, were found to be significantly associated with quadriceps weakness. Secondly, crepitus of the knee was associated with multiple MRI features (that is, LTF cartilage integrity, osteophytes in all three compartments and effusion), similar to a recently conducted population-based study 33, but was not associated with any feature from CR. This indicates that MRI seems to be able to visualize features underlying crepitus, while CR is not.

A new and potentially important finding from our study is the association of OA-related inflammation (effusion and/or synovitis) with quadriceps weakness, which is in line with previous experimental studies demonstrating an effect of effusion on quadriceps function 495051. Quadriceps muscles are considered the most important muscles for knee movements, stabilization and shock absorption 11. Persons with synovitis and/or effusion had significantly lower quadriceps strength compared with persons without synovitis/effusion. In secondary analyses, similar results were yielded after adjustment for pain severity, indicating that pain does not explain the association between inflammation and quadriceps weakness. Because inflammation of the synovial membrane had mostly been identified in the infrapatellar region (that is, in 86% of persons with synovitis), which is adjacent to the patellar tendon of the quadriceps muscles, it seems plausible that quadriceps function is affected by inflammatory processes nearby the patella. In addition, inflammation may occur inside the muscle as well, which could result in decreased muscle strength 52. Effusion is presumed to cause muscle weakness by muscle reflex inhibition due to increased intra-articular pressure 495051. Although knee joint inflammation has been suggested to also affect proprioceptive accuracy 7, we were not able to demonstrate this. A possible explanation could be that our study participants demonstrated relatively healthy proprioceptive accuracy. Previous studies provided conflicting results for the role of non-inflammatory effusion (that is, saline injections) in proprioceptive accuracy 5354. Future studies need to focus on OA-related inflammation, instead of non-inflammatory injections, to clarify the role of inflammation in proprioception.

The associations between effusion, synovitis and quadriceps weakness could be highly relevant for selecting knee OA treatment. If inflammatory processes underlie quadriceps weakness, regular quadriceps strengthening exercises are not likely to be beneficial and anti-inflammatory therapy might be needed first. This implication is in line with a recent study in which patients treated with both NSAIDs and exercises improved more in muscle strength compared with patients treated with exercises only 55. In addition, our data revealed that physical examination of the knee strongly underestimated the prevalence of inflammation of the knee, since warmth was palpated in only 4% of our participants, compared with a prevalence of 34% for synovitis and 39% for medium/large effusion, detected by MRI. This implies that MRI may have additional value for clinical assessment in patients with inflammation. Our findings also emphasize that OA is not only characterized by cartilage degeneration and bony changes but also by inflammatory changes, which may point out the importance of anti-inflammatory therapies in knee OA.

Our study design has some limitations that need to be noticed. Firstly, we did not use contrast-enhanced MR imaging techniques to minimize risks for participants (for example, risk of allergic reactions, nephropathy). Because of the well-known superiority of contrast-enhanced MRI for synovitis detection 56, it is remarkable that even without contrast infusions we were able to detect an association of both effusion and synovitis with quadriceps weakness. Although noncontrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated lower specificity for detecting synovitis compared with contrast-enhanced MRI, meaning that signal intensity alterations do not always represent synovitis, it is also been found to be a highly sensitive technique (≈100% sensitivity) for synovitis detection 57. This implies that the prevalence of synovitis in our study could be an overestimation, but that all persons with actual synovitis have presumably been detected. Secondly, we are not sure whether the power of our study was sufficient. Most MRI studies included large cohorts (n >200), while our study consists of 105 participants. This sample size may have resulted in loss of statistical power. In addition, participants had been selected based on the presence of knee joint instability, since they participated in a study on the effectiveness of a knee stabilization exercise program, which may have introduced selection bias in the present study. Thirdly, our study design was cross-sectional with no control group, while a longitudinal design, preferably using a control group of patients at risk, is necessary to unravel interactions between tissue abnormalities, biomechanical factors and physical examination findings. However, this study has a unique design because it is the first study we are aware of in which associations could be explored between both radiography and MRI with biomechanical and physical examination features in a knee OA cohort.

Conclusions

This explorative study detected several new and clinically relevant findings, including associations of MRI-based effusion/synovitis with quadriceps weakness. Inflammation was detected in over one-third of the participants, emphasizing the inflammatory component of OA and a possible important role of anti-inflammatory therapies in knee OA. In general, OA-related tissue abnormalities of the knee, even those detected by MRI, were found to be discordant with biomechanical and physical examination features. As this is an explorative study, replication in future research is needed.

Abbreviations

BML: bone marrow lesions; CR: conventional radiography; JSW: joint space width; LTF: lateral tibiofemoral; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MTF: medial tibiofemoral; NSAID: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; OA: osteoarthritis; PF: patellafemoral.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JK, JD and WFL were responsible for conception and design. JK, JD, JPK, MvdL, MvdE, DR, REV, MG, LDR, MPMS and WFL were responsible for acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data. All authors were responsible for drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the manuscript for publication. JK takes full responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to finished article.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge T Schweigmann for obtaining MRI scans and S Romviel for biomechanical and clinical assessments. The study was funded by the Dutch Arthritis Association and Servier. The study sponsors had no involvement in the study.

An update on the pathogenesis and epidemiology of osteoarthritisFelsonDTRadiol Clin North Am20044219v10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00161-115049520Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practiceBijlsmaJWBerenbaumFLafeberFPLancet20113772115212610.1016/S0140-6736(11)60243-221684382Reports of joint instability in knee osteoarthritis: its prevalence and relationship to physical functionFitzgeraldGKPivaSRIrrgangJJArthritis Rheum20045194194610.1002/art.2082515593258Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritisSchmittLCFitzgeraldGKReismanASRudolphKSPhys Ther2008881506151610.2522/ptj.20060223259979418820096Association of lower muscle strength with self-reported knee instability in osteoarthritis of the knee: results from the Amsterdam Osteoarthritis CohortKnoopJvan der LeedenMvan der EschMThorstenssonCAGerritsenMVoornemanRELemsWFRoordaLDDekkerJSteultjensMPArthritis Care Res (Hoboken)201264384510.1002/acr.20597Muscle strength, pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritisSteultjensMPDekkerJvan BaarMEOostendorpRABijlsmaJWClin Rehabil20011533134110.1191/02692150167317840811386405Proprioception in knee osteoarthritis: a narrative reviewKnoopJSteultjensMPvan der LeedenMvan der EschMThorstenssonCARoordaLDLemsWFDekkerJOsteoarthritis Cartilage20111938138810.1016/j.joca.2011.01.00321251988Laxity in healthy and osteoarthritic kneesSharmaLLouCFelsonDTDunlopDDKirwan-MellisGHayesKWWeinrachDBuchananTSArthritis Rheum19994286187010.1002/1529-0131(199905)42:5<861::AID-ANR4>3.0.CO;2-N10323441Reduced quadriceps strength relative to body weight: a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis in women?SlemendaCHeilmanDKBrandtKDKatzBPMazzucaSABraunsteinEMByrdDArthritis Rheum1998411951195910.1002/1529-0131(199811)41:11<1951::AID-ART9>3.0.CO;2-99811049Physical functioning over three years in knee osteoarthritis: role of psychosocial, local mechanical, and neuromuscular factorsSharmaLCahueSSongJHayesKPaiYCDunlopDArthritis Rheum2003483359337010.1002/art.1142014673987Role of muscle in the genesis and management of knee osteoarthritisBennellKLHuntMAWrigleyTVLimBWHinmanRSRheum Dis Clin North Am20083473175410.1016/j.rdc.2008.05.00518687280The effects of impaired joint position sense on the development and progression of pain and structural damage in knee osteoarthritisFelsonDTGrossKDNevittMCYangMLaneNETornerJCLewisCEHurleyMVArthritis Rheum2009611070107610.1002/art.24606275827119644911The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literatureBedsonJCroftPRBMC Musculoskelet Disord2008911610.1186/1471-2474-9-116254299618764949Imaging of osteoarthritis: update from a radiological perspectiveGuermaziARoemerFWHayashiDCurr Opin Rheumatol20112348449110.1097/BOR.0b013e328349c2d221760511Association between radiographic joint space narrowing, function, pain and muscle power in severe osteoarthritis of the kneeBarkerKLambSEToyeFJacksonSBarringtonSClin Rehabil20041879380010.1191/0269215504cr754oa15573836Quadriceps weakness and its relationship to tibiofemoral and patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis in Chinese: the Beijing osteoarthritis studyBakerKRXuLZhangYNevittMNiuJAliabadiPYuWFelsonDArthritis Rheum2004501815182110.1002/art.2026115188358Effect of thigh strength on incident radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in a longitudinal cohortSegalNATornerJCFelsonDNiuJSharmaLLewisCENevittMArthritis Rheum2009611210121710.1002/art.24541283055119714608Isometric quadriceps strength in women with mild, moderate, and severe knee osteoarthritisPalmieri-SmithRMThomasACKarvonen-GutierrezCSowersMFAm J Phys Med Rehabil20108954154810.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ddd5c3329445220463561Quadriceps weakness predicts risk for knee joint space narrowing in women in the MOST cohortSegalNAGlassNATornerJYangMFelsonDTSharmaLNevittMLewisCEOsteoarthritis Cartilage20101876977510.1016/j.joca.2010.02.002287306220188686Quadriceps weakness, patella alta, and structural features of patellofemoral osteoarthritisStefanikJJGuermaziAZhuYZumwaltACGrossKDClancyMLynchJASegalNALewisCERoemerFWPowersCMFelsonDTArthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2011631391139710.1002/acr.20528Quadriceps strength and the risk of cartilage loss and symptom progression in knee osteoarthritisAminSBakerKNiuJClancyMGogginsJGuermaziAGrigoryanMHunterDJFelsonDTArthritis Rheum20096018919810.1002/art.2418219116936Structural joint changes, malalignment, and laxity in osteoarthritis of the kneevan der EschMSteultjensMWieringaHDinantHDekkerJScand J Rheumatol20053429830110.1080/0300974051001865116195163Relationship of meniscal damage, meniscal extrusion, malalignment, and joint laxity to subsequent cartilage loss in osteoarthritic kneesSharmaLEcksteinFSongJGuermaziAPrasadPKapoorDCahueSMarshallMHudelmaierMDunlopDArthritis Rheum2008581716172610.1002/art.2346218512777The effect of marginal osteophytes on reduction of varus-valgus instability in osteoarthritic kneesPottengerLAPhillipsFMDraganichLFArthritis Rheum19903385385810.1002/art.17803306122363739The Bristol 'OA500' study: progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee jointDieppePACushnaghanJShepstoneLOsteoarthritis Cartilage19975879710.1016/S1063-4584(97)80002-79135820Osteoarthritis: MR imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findingsLinkTMSteinbachLSGhoshSRiesMLuYLaneNMajumdarSRadiology200322637338110.1148/radiol.226201219012563128The relationship between specific tissue lesions and pain severity in persons with knee osteoarthritisTorresLDunlopDDPeterfyCGuermaziAPrasadPHayesKWSongJCahueSChangAMarshallMSharmaLOsteoarthritis Cartilage2006141033104010.1016/j.joca.2006.03.01516713310Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findingsKornaatPRBloemJLCeulemansRYRiyaziNRosendaalFRNelissenRGCarterWOHellio Le GraverandMPKloppenburgMRadiology200623981181710.1148/radiol.239305025316714463Associations between pain, function, and radiographic features in osteoarthritis of the kneeSzebenyiBHollanderAPDieppePQuiltyBDuddyJClarkeSKirwanJRArthritis Rheum20065423023510.1002/art.2153416385522MR imaging findings in the follow-up of patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis and the correlation with clinical symptomsPhanCMLinkTMBlumenkrantzGDunnTCRiesMDSteinbachLSMajumdarSEur Radiol20061660861810.1007/s00330-005-0004-516222533Pre-radiographic MRI findings are associated with onset of knee symptoms: the most studyJavaidMKLynchJATolstykhIGuermaziARoemerFAliabadiPMcCullochCCurtisJFelsonDLaneNETornerJNevittMOsteoarthritis Cartilage20101832332810.1016/j.joca.2009.11.002299096019919856Associations of anatomical measures from MRI with radiographically defined knee osteoarthritis score, pain, and physical functioningSowersMKarvonen-GutierrezCAJacobsonJAJiangYYosefMJ Bone Joint Surg Am20119324125110.2106/JBJS.I.00667302845221266638The association of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected structural pathology of the knee with crepitus in a population-based cohort with knee pain: the MoDEKO studyCremaMDGuermaziASayreECRoemerFWWongHThorneASingerJEsdaileJMMarraMDKopecJANicolaouSCibereJOsteoarthritis Cartilage2011191429143210.1016/j.joca.2011.09.00321945851Knee joint stabilization therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, controlled trialKnoopJDekkerJLeeden vdMEsch vdMThorstenssonCAGerritsenMVoornemanREPeterWRooijdMRomvielSLemsWFRoordaLDSteultjensMPM2012SubmittedDevelopment of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism AssociationAltmanRAschEBlochDBoleGBorensteinDBrandtKChristyWCookeTDGreenwaldRHochbergMArthritis Rheum1986291039104910.1002/art.17802908163741515Joint proprioception, muscle strength, and functional ability in patients with osteoarthritis of the kneevan der EschMSteultjensMHarlaarJKnolDLemsWDekkerJArthritis Rheum20075778779310.1002/art.2277917530678Joint laxity and the relationship between muscle strength and functional ability in patients with osteoarthritis of the kneevan der EschMSteultjensMKnolDLDinantHDekkerJArthritis Rheum20065595395910.1002/art.2234417139642Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss viewsBuckland-WrightJCWolfeFWardRJFlowersNHayneCJ Rheumatol1999262664267410606380Detecting radiographic knee osteoarthritis: what combination of views is optimal?ChaissonCEGaleDRGaleEKazisLSkinnerKFelsonDTRheumatology (Oxford)2000391218122110.1093/rheumatology/39.11.1218Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revisedAltmanRDGoldGEOsteoarthritis Cartilage200715Suppl AA1A5617320422Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosisKellgrenJHLawrenceJSAnn Rheum Dis19571649450210.1136/ard.16.4.494100699513498604The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score)HunterDJLoGHGaleDGraingerAJGuermaziAConaghanPGAnn Rheum Dis20086720621110.1136/ard.2006.06618317472995Correlation of the development of knee pain with enlarging bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imagingFelsonDTNiuJGuermaziARoemerFAliabadiPClancyMTornerJLewisCENevittMCArthritis Rheum2007562986299210.1002/art.2285117763427Relationship between bone marrow lesions, cartilage loss and pain in knee osteoarthritis: results from a randomised controlled clinical trial using MRIWildiLMRaynauldJPMartel-PelletierJAbramFDoraisMPelletierJPAnn Rheum Dis2010692118212410.1136/ard.2009.12799320610445Fluctuation of knee pain and changes in bone marrow lesions, effusions, and synovitis on magnetic resonance imagingZhangYNevittMNiuJLewisCTornerJGuermaziARoemerFMcCullochCFelsonDTArthritis Rheum20116369169910.1002/art.30148305615621360498Presence of MRI-detected joint effusion and synovitis increases the risk of cartilage loss in knees without osteoarthritis at 30-month follow-up: the MOST studyRoemerFWGuermaziAFelsonDTNiuJNevittMCCremaMDLynchJALewisCETornerJZhangYAnn Rheum Dis2011701804180910.1136/ard.2011.150243349608421791448Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic reviewYusufEKortekaasMCWattIHuizingaTWKloppenburgMAnn Rheum Dis201170606710.1136/ard.2010.13190420829200Knee laxity in symptomatic osteoarthritisBrageMEDraganichLFPottengerLACurranJJClin Orthop Relat Res19943041841898020213Knee joint effusion and quadriceps reflex inhibition in manSpencerJDHayesKCAlexanderIJArch Phys Med Rehabil1984651711776712434Chronic knee effusion and aspiration: the effect on quadriceps inhibitionJonesDWJonesDANewhamDJBr J Rheumatol19872637037410.1093/rheumatology/26.5.3703664162The effects of knee effusion on quadriceps strength and knee intraarticular pressureJensenKGrafBKArthroscopy19939525610.1016/S0749-8063(05)80343-38442830Increased inflammatory cytokine expression in the vastus lateralis of patients with knee osteoarthritisLevingerILevingerPTrenerryMKFellerJABartlettJRBergmanNMcKennaMJCameron-SmithDArthritis Rheum2011631343134810.1002/art.3028721538317Effects of joint effusion on proprioception in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trialChoYRHongBYLimSHKimHWKoYJImSALeeJIOsteoarthritis Cartilage201119222810.1016/j.joca.2010.10.01321034839Knee joint effusion and proprioceptionMcNairPJMarshallRNMaguireKBrownCArch Phys Med Rehabil19957656656810.1016/S0003-9993(95)80512-57763157Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or glucosamine reduced pain and improved muscle strength with resistance training in a randomized controlled trial of knee osteoarthritis patientsPetersenSGBeyerNHansenMHolmLAagaardPMackeyALKjaerMArch Phys Med Rehabil2011921185119310.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.00921807137Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of subchondral bone and soft tissues in knee osteoarthritisCremaMDRoemerFWMarraMDGuermaziARheum Dis Clin North Am20093555757710.1016/j.rdc.2009.08.00319931803Hoffa's fat pad: evaluation on unenhanced MR images as a measure of patellofemoral synovitis in osteoarthritisRoemerFWGuermaziAZhangYYangMHunterDJCremaMDBohndorfKAm J Roentgenol20091921696170010.2214/AJR.08.2038