<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
<ui>ar3989</ui>
<ji>1478-6354</ji>
<fm>
<dochead>Meeting abstract</dochead>
<bibl>
<title><p>Development validation and reliability of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50</p></title>
<aug>
<au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Touma</snm><fnm>Z</fnm><insr iid="I1"/></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Gladman</snm><fnm>DD</fnm><insr iid="I1"/></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Urowitz</snm><fnm>MB</fnm><insr iid="I1"/></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>University of Toronto, ON, Canada</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Arthritis Research &amp; Therapy</source>


<supplement><title><p>Lupus 2012: New targets, new approaches</p></title><editor>Peter E Lipsky, John M Esdaile, Matthew H Liang and Paul R Fortin</editor><note>Meeting abstracts</note></supplement><conference><title><p>Lupus 2012: New targets, new approaches</p></title><location>Whistler, Canada</location><date-range>27-30 September 2012</date-range></conference><issn>1478-6354</issn>
<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>Suppl 3</issue>
<fpage>A55</fpage>
<url>http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/S3/A55</url>
<xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar3989</pubid></xrefbib></bibl>
<history><pub><date><day>27</day><month>9</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Touma et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
</fm>
<bdy>
<sec><st><p>Background</p></st>
<p>The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) is a global disease activity index composed of 24 descriptors reflecting nine organ systems. The SLEDAI-2K measures only complete recovery in active descriptors on follow-up visits. Thus, an improvement in the SLEDAI-2K descriptors is captured when a manifestation has completely resolved. The aims were: to develop and validate an outcome measure, the SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 (S2K RI-50), able to capture partial improvement, &#8805;50%, in each of the active descriptors at subsequent visits; to test the reliability of S2K RI-50; and to evaluate S2K RI-50 sensitivity to response at 6 and 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Methods</p></st>
<p>The S2K RI-50 was constructed based on SLEDAI-2K. New definitions for all descriptors were generated along with criteria to identify 50% improvement. The S2K RI-50 Data Retrieval Form standardizes the documentation of the descriptors. From September 2009 to April 2011, all lupus patients seen at the Lupus Clinic were assessed at baseline and follow-up visits using SLEDAI-2K, S2K RI-50 and physician global assessment (visual analog scale online and Likert scale). Concurrent construct validity: correlation of the S2K RI-50 was determined using the Likert scale as the external construct. Inter-rater/intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)): 40 patient scenarios with baseline and follow-up visits derived from real patients were developed. Ten rheumatologists scored the profiles with the SLEDAI-2K and S2K RI-50, on two occasions 2 weeks apart. Sensitivity to response: responders using the SLEDAI-2K, S2K RI-50 and SLE Responder Index (SRI) were identified at 6 and 12 months among 103 consecutive active patients. Patients defined as S2K RI-50 responders were compared with SRI responders; considered the gold standard.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Results</p></st>
<p>The S2K RI-50 and its <b>
</b>Data Retrieval Form were developed. The initial validation on 141 patients showed that S2K RI-50 has construct validity (correlated with Likert scale; <it>r </it>= 0.48; <it>P </it>&lt; 0.0001). The S2K RI-50 is reliable and the ICC for inter-rater/intra-rater ranged from 0.86 to 1.00. The percentage of responders at 6 and 12 months was 44% and 51% by SLEDAI-2K and 43% and 51% by SRI respectively. The percentage of S2K RI-50 responders at 6 and 12 months was higher at 51% and 58% respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Conclusion</p></st>
<p>The S2K RI-50 is novel valid and reliable responder index able to identify patients with partial, &#8805;50% improvement. The S2K RI-50 identified more responders as compared with the SLEDAI-2K and SRI at the 6 and 12 month period. The S2K RI-50 can be used independently to identify patients with clinically important improvement.</p>
</sec>
</bdy>
<bm>
<ack><sec><st><p>Acknowledgements</p></st>
<p>The authors acknowledge all who participated in these studies.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
</bm>
</art>