<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>ar3378</ui>
   <ji>1478-6354</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Review</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Lupus nephritis: current update</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Saxena</snm><fnm>Ramesh</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>Ramesh.saxena@utsouthwestern.edu</email></au>
            <au id="A2"><snm>Mahajan</snm><fnm>Tina</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>tina.mahajan@utsw.edu</email></au>
            <au ca="yes" id="A3"><snm>Mohan</snm><fnm>Chandra</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>Chandra.mohan@utsouthwestern.edu</email></au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1"><p>Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA</p></ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Arthritis Research &amp; Therapy</source>
         <issn>1478-6354</issn>
         <pubdate>2011</pubdate>
         <volume>13</volume>
         <issue>5</issue>
         <fpage>240</fpage>
         <url>http://arthritis-research.com/content/13/5/240</url>
         <xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">22078716</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar3378</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history><pub><date><day>28</day><month>9</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
      <cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>BioMed Central Ltd</collab></cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <p>Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The general consensus is that 60% of lupus patients will develop clinically relevant nephritis at some time in the course of their illness. Prompt recognition and treatment of renal disease is important, as early response to therapy is correlated with better outcome. The present review summarizes our current understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying lupus nephritis and how the disease is currently diagnosed and treated.</p>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification subtype="pubmedcentral-release-delay-information" type="BMC">
            <?release-delay 6|0 ?>
         </classification>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Introduction</p>
         </st>
         <p>Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The general consensus is that 60% of lupus patients will develop clinically relevant nephritis at some time in the course of their illness <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Prompt recognition and treatment of renal disease is important, as early response to therapy is correlated with better outcome <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. The present review summarizes our current understanding of SLE pathogenesis, summarizes how the disease is diagnosed and treated, and expands on new emerging therapies.</p>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Epidemiology of lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Most SLE patients develop nephritis early in the course of their disease. The vast majority of patients who develop nephritis are younger than 55 years, and children are more likely to develop severe nephritis than are elderly patients <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. In a recent retrospective study, male sex, young age (&lt;33 years), and non-European ancestry were found to be determinants of earlier renal disease in patients with SLE. Asian, African Caribbean, and African American ethnicities may present with more severe nephritis than other ethnic groups <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Diagnosis of lupus nephritis</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Clinical features of lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Proteinuria is the characteristic feature of renal disease in lupus. In a comprehensive review of LN, proteinuria was reported in 100% of patients, with nephrotic syndrome being reported in 45 to 65% <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. Microscopic hematuria was found to occur in about 80% of patients during the disease course, invariably associated with proteinuria. Macroscopic hematuria is rare in LN. Hypertension is not common but is present more frequently in patients with severe nephritis. About one-half of all patients with LN will have a reduced glomerular filtration rate, and occasionally patients present with acute kidney injury. Renal tubular function is often disturbed, resulting in urinary excretion of Tamm-Horsefall proteins, light chains and &#946;<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Clinical diagnosis of lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Ideally, urinary protein excretion is gauged using a 24-hour urine collection. Although universally practiced, variable results may occur over a short period of time, probably due to changes in physical activity or collection errors. The latter problem can be remedied by quantifying total creatinine in the same 24-hour urine collection. The total creatinine measurement should approximate values obtained in 24-hour urine collections from the same patient and should be comparable with average values obtained in population studies of men (20 mg/kg/day) and women (15 mg/kg/day). Alternatively, the urinary protein excretion rate can be estimated by assaying the protein/creatinine ratio in a random daytime urinary sample. This ratio approximates the total number of grams per day of proteinuria, but it would be optimal to confirm the validity of this method in individual patients, as described <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>The urinary sediment is also useful for characterizing renal disease activity, since the presence of hematuria, leukocyturia or casts are typical only during periods of disease activity. Interestingly, in one large series of 520 cases of SLE, red cell casts were only present in 39 cases (7.5% of patients). In descending order, the most common abnormal urinary sediment findings in LN are leukocyturia, hematuria, granular casts and hyaline casts <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>A rising anti-DNA antibody titer and hypo-complementemia, especially with low complement C3, are strong indicators of active lupus renal disease, although serology cannot be used in isolation to diagnose or monitor renal disease. Hypo-albuminemia accompanied by significant proteinuria is a component of the nephrotic syndrome that may accompany active lupus renal disease. Hypercholesterolemia is another marker and also a clinical complication of the nephrotic syndrome that can accompany active LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>There is increasing recognition of the importance of tubulointerstitial injury in LN. In the majority of patients, the severity of interstitial inflammation parallels the degree of involvement of the glomerulus. Tubular damage, fibrosis and atrophy can be associated with hyperuricemia and renal tubular acidosis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Histologic diagnosis of lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Kidney biopsy is the mainstay for the diagnosis of LN. Material obtained by renal biopsy is evaluated by light microscopy, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. In many cases, renal biopsy is instrumental in establishing the diagnosis of SLE because nephritis can be the first clinical manifestation of SLE in up to 15 to 20% of patients <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. In the majority of cases, however, the diagnosis of SLE is already established. In such situations, renal biopsy helps to establish a precise diagnosis of LN, the extent of histopathological chronicity and activity, disease prognosis, and also serves as a guide for therapy. The appearance of any new markers of kidney disease such as proteinuria, hematuria, active urinary sediment or rise in serum creatinine in a SLE patient should also prompt a renal biopsy. Moreover, one should consider a follow-up biopsy in a stable patient with established LN if the aforesaid markers reappear or worsen.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Histologic classification of lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Because of the extremely diverse histopathology of LN, several classifications have been proposed over the past four decades - the earliest schemes being proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1974, further refined by Austin and colleagues <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. In order to further standardize definitions and to facilitate uniformity in reporting, as well as to eliminate ambiguities and inconsistencies in the WHO classification, the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification was formulated in 2003, as detailed in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. This classification defines more precisely all glomerulonephritis (GN) classes and clearly delineates activity and chronicity.</p>
            <tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification of lupus nephritis</p></caption><tblbdy cols="2">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Class I</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Class II</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Class III</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Focal lupus nephritis (&lt;50% glomeruli)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" indent="1">
            <p>III(A)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Active lesions</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" indent="1">
            <p>III(A/C)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Active and chronic lesions</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" indent="1">
            <p>III(C)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chronic lesions</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Class IV</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Diffuse lupus nephritis (&gt;50% glomeruli)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Diffuse segmental (IV-S) or global (IV-G)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" indent="1">
            <p>IV(A)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Active lesions</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" indent="1">
            <p>IV(A/C)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Active and chronic lesions</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" indent="1">
            <p>IV(C)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chronic lesions</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Class V</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Membranous lupus nephritis</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Class VI</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis</p>
            <p>(&#8805;90% globally sclerosed glomeruli without residual activity)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Adapted with premission from Weening <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
            <p>Two recent studies demonstrate the superior reproducibility of the ISN/RPS classification compared with the WHO classification of LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. In a large study involving 20 centers in the UK, renal pathologists classified cases of LN using the WHO system and then reclassified the same cases using the ISN/RPS 2003 classification scheme one year later. A significantly higher interobserver reproducibility was observed using the ISN/RPS (2003) classification than using the modified WHO (1982) classification <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Pathogenesis of lupus nephritis</p>
         </st>
         <p>Multiple mechanisms lead to LN, as reviewed elsewhere <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. The pathogenic events leading to LN can be parsed into two phases: systemic events in the immune system, and local events in the end organs (see Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). The present review focuses on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive LN pathogenesis within the kidneys. Systemic events that orchestrate autoimmunity in SLE have been discussed in previous reviews <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>, and will not be examined here.</p>
         <fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Molecular pathogenesis of lupus nephritis and potential therapeutic targets</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Molecular pathogenesis of lupus nephritis and potential therapeutic targets</b>. Multiple steps lead to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Captioned are two key sets of events underlying lupus nephritis (LN): one that engenders systemic autoimmunity, and another that drives end-organ inflammation and damage, as discussed in the text. Many of the cells and molecules in these pathogenic cascades also serve as attractive therapeutic targets, as detailed below. <b>(1), (2) </b>Dendritic cell (DC):T-cell and T-cell:B-cell interactions involve multiple co-stimulatory molecules, including CD28/B7, ICOS/ICOSL, and CD40/CD40L; blockade of these co-stimulatory pathways is being tested as potential therapeutic strategies in lupus. <b>(3) </b>Blys/BAFF elaborated by myeloid cells binds to receptors on B cells, and drives autoantibody production in SLE. Blocking this axis is emerging as a promising therapeutic avenue, based on recent clinical trials. <b>(4) </b>CD20, CD22, and CD19 are receptors on B cells. Several trials are aimed at depleting B cells in SLE, using antibodies to these B-cell molecules. <b>(5) </b>The activation of autoreactive B cells (and other leukocytes) in SLE is mediated by several signaling axes; some of these have been therapeutically targeted with success in preclinical models of the disease, and in limited clinical trials. <b>(6) </b>Type 1 interferon-elicited gene signatures have emerged as a distinctive feature of SLE. Based on these exciting leads, therapeutics targeting this axis are currently in active trials. <b>(7) </b>Activated lymphocytes and myeloid cells utilize a variety of cell adhesion molecules in order to gain access to the target organs. Therapeutics targeting these adhesion molecules and/or vascular addressins have shown promise in preclinical models of lupus. <b>(8) </b>Clearance of immune complexes is mediated by complement (receptor) and Fc/FcR-mediated mechanisms; targeting these nodes has also shown promise in murine lupus. <b>(9) </b>Activated leukocytes (as well as resident renal cells) elaborate a large spectrum of disease mediators, including various cytokines and chemokines. Blockade of these mediators also hold promise in ameliorating LN, although we are in the infancy of these studies. CD40L, CD40 ligand; ICOS, inducible T-cell costimulator; ICOSL, inducible T-cell costimulator ligand; TCR, T-cell receptor.</p>
</text><graphic file="ar3378-1"/></fig>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Role of lymphocytes in lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>T cells rank among the most conspicuous inflammatory cells within the inflamed kidney in both SLE patients and mouse models of LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. T cells cloned from the renal interstitium of MRL/<it>lpr </it>lupus mice have been shown to be autoreactive to renal antigens, to induce tubular epithelial and mesangial cell proliferation, and to produce cytokines such as IFN&#947;. The pathogenic role of T cells within the kidneys has been demonstrated through the use of renal transplantation in MHC II-deficient or CD4<sup>-/- </sup>lupus-prone mice and treatment with anti-CD4 antibody <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. Radeke and colleagues have demonstrated that CD4<sup>+ </sup>T cells alone were sufficient as initiators and effectors in nephritis, by recognizing specific antigens expressed within the glomeruli in an experimental mouse model of GN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although the antigen specificity of intrarenal T cells in LN remains elusive, their effector function has been shown to be mediated through a couple of key cell-surface molecules and released cytokines.</p>
            <p>Substantial evidence has been garnered for the pathogenic role of CD40 ligand (CD40L), a member of the TNF family <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. The interaction of T-cell CD40L and CD40 expressed on B cells plays a central role in humoral immune responses, having the capacity to induce clonal expansion, immunoglobulin class switch and differentiation of B cells into plasma cells. In addition, CD40 is expressed on various effectors cells, such as macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells (DCs), as well as resident renal cells, suggesting that CD40-CD40L interactions may be important in driving effector functions of other CD40-expressing cells within the kidneys <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. CD40 expression is markedly upregulated in proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN), in parallel with the increased presence of CD40L-bearing T cells in kidneys <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. Activated T cells co-cultured with renal tubular epithelial cell elaborate high levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1, RANTES, IL-8 and interferon-inducible protein-10 from tubular epithelial cells, mediated in part through CD40-CD40L interactions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Among the cytokines released by T cells, a predominance of T-helper type 1 response has been documented by several studies in human LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>, further supported by blocking (or gene ablation) studies in murine LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, there is also some evidence that T- helper type 2 cytokines can also have a potential impact on LN. In several lupus-prone mouse models, engineering the upregulation of IL-4 worsens LN, whereas IL-4 blockade or gene ablation ameliorates disease <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. Given that IL-4 has also been implicated in fibroblast proliferation, collagen gene expression, collagen synthesis and transforming growth factor beta (TGF&#946;) production, IL-4 may directly act upon renal cells to perpetuate glomerulosclerosis and chronic renal fibrosis, partly through its effect on extracellular matrix generation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Role of myeloid cells in lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Besides lymphocytes, myeloid cells also play critical roles in LN. Within normal human kidneys, at least two myeloid DC subtypes characterized by BDCA-1<sup>+</sup>DC-SIGN<sup>+ </sup>and BDCA-1<sup>+</sup>DC-SIGN<sup>- </sup>and one plasmacytoid DC subtype defined as BDCA-2<sup>+</sup>DC-SIGN<sup>- </sup>are abundantly located in the tubulointerstitium, but are rarely observed within the glomeruli <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp>. In LN patients, strong renal infiltrates of BDCA1<sup>+</sup>, BDCA3<sup>+ </sup>and BDCA4<sup>+ </sup>DCs have been reported. Notably, DCs infiltrated both the tubulointerstitium and the glomeruli, with the extent of infiltration correlating well with the severity of renal damage, notably class III/IV LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. As in normal kidneys, DC infiltrates in diseased human kidneys were mostly immature, marked by the absence of DC-LAMP<sup>+ </sup>cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>. In contrast to the renal DCs, a significant decrease of myeloid DCs and/or plasmacytoid DCs has been observed in the peripheral blood of lupus patients <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr></abbrgrp>. It has been suggested that the decreased number of DCs in peripheral blood may be a consequence of their enhanced migration into the end organs <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr><abbr bid="B52">52</abbr></abbrgrp>. Studies in murine models have also reported increased infiltration of DCs into the renal glomeruli and tubulointerstitium <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr><abbr bid="B56">56</abbr></abbrgrp>. Relatively little is known about how renal infiltrating DCs contribute to the pathogenesis of LN, although a couple of scenarios have been suggested. First, DCs may elaborate proinflammatory and profibrotic factors, including TNF&#945;, IL-6, IL-1, IL-18, IFN&#945; and TGF&#946; <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr></abbrgrp>. Second, DCs can migrate to local lymph nodes and potentially present renal autoantigens to T lymphocytes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>. Third, since renal DCs express various co-stimulatory molecules such as CD40L, MHC II and chemokine receptors such as CCR1 and CCR5, they could directly interact with and activate intrinsic renal cells and other infiltrating inflammatory cells, hence perpetuating disease <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Macrophages represent a second myeloid cell type that is recruited to the kidneys in LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recruited macrophages are located in both the glomerular tuft and tubulointerstitium, and constitute the major cell type in glomerular crescents <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>. Renal infiltrating macrophages exhibit elevated expression of CD11b, OX40L, CD80 and CD86, being markers of disease onset in LN. Once recruited, activated macrophages could play a wide variety of roles in meditating renal injury, largely by secreting various proinflammatory mediators (including TNF and IL-1), reactive oxygen species and proteolytic enzymes. Although the obligatory role for macrophages has been demonstrated in experimental GN models <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr><abbr bid="B66">66</abbr><abbr bid="B67">67</abbr><abbr bid="B68">68</abbr></abbrgrp>, whether they are equally essential for LN remains unknown.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Role of resident renal cells in lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>The major resident cells in the kidney include mesangial cells, endothelial cells and epithelial cells. These intrinsic renal cells represent both the cause and the victim of various insults leading to GN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B69">69</abbr><abbr bid="B70">70</abbr></abbrgrp>. Perhaps the most compelling evidence that intrinsic renal cells play an important role in immune-meditated GN has come from bone-marrow transfer or kidney- transplant studies in mice subjected to anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis. Studies of this nature have helped outline the disease role of MHC II, TNF and Fn14 on intrinsic renal cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr><abbr bid="B73">73</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Beside these isolated examples, we know very little about whether other molecules need to be intrinsically expressed within resident renal cells in order for immune-mediated GN to ensue. Some studies have suggested that resident renal cells from lupus-prone mice are intrinsically aberrant; for example, it has been reported that mesangial cells from lupus mice have a decreased threshold for the production of inflammatory mediators, and do indeed elaborate more monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and osteopontin <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr><abbr bid="B75">75</abbr><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>. We currently have no insights into whether intrinsic renal cells may be fundamentally different in human LN compared with what we know about the role of infiltrating leukocytes in LN. Therefore, our understanding of how intrinsic renal cells contribute to disease is rudimentary.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Role of cytokines and chemokines in lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>As alluded to above, cytokines have emerged as important players in the pathogenesis of LN. Whereas some cytokines that aggravate LN may act predominantly in a systemic fashion (for example, BAFF), other cytokines such as IL-17, IFN&#945; and TGF&#946; have been shown to have a role in systemic autoimmunity as well as local renal disease. Increased IL-17-producing T cells have been documented within the kidneys in both SLE patients and SNF1 lupus-prone mice, with disease treatment being associated with reduced numbers of these cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B77">77</abbr><abbr bid="B78">78</abbr></abbrgrp>. Several independent experiments have found peripheral blood mononuclear cells from SLE patients to exhibit a prominent type I interferon-inducible gene expression profile, referred to as the interferon signature, supporting the hypothesis that type I interferons may play a key role in lupus pathogenesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B79">79</abbr><abbr bid="B80">80</abbr><abbr bid="B81">81</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although IFN-I is known to impact systemic immunity in a variety of ways, recent evidence indicates that IFN-I produced by resident renal cells may be also contribute to renal inflammation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B82">82</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>TGF&#946; is a potent multifunctional cytokine that exerts an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive role systemically, but a profibrotic role locally within diseased kidneys. The action of persistent, dysregulated TGF&#946; production on the extracellular matrix drives progressive renal disease in LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>. Elevated TGF&#946; expression has been found in SLE renal tissue, correlating well with histological activity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr><abbr bid="B85">85</abbr><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>. Also, disease remission in LN is related to decreased renal TGF&#946; expression <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B85">85</abbr></abbrgrp>. The collective data in the field strongly indicate that reduced TGF&#946; in immune cells predisposes mice to immune dysregulation and autoantibody production, whereas enhanced TGF&#946; expression within the kidneys leads to dysregulated tissue repair, progressive fibrogenesis and eventual end-organ damage <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B87">87</abbr></abbrgrp>. Hence, TGF&#946; is a double-edged sword - subduing systemic immunity, but aggravating chronic nephritis.</p>
            <p>As discussed above, macrophages play a central role in mediating LN. Hence, not surprisingly, colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1, the principal macrophage growth factor) and macrophage migration inhibitory factor - key proinflammatory cytokines regulating macrophage recruitment - have also been documented as central players in LN. Renal resident cells, most notably tubular epithelial cells, are the primary source of CSF-1 during renal disease <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B88">88</abbr><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp>. Increased renal expression of CSF-1 has been noted before overt renal pathology and becomes more abundant with advancing LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B90">90</abbr></abbrgrp>. Mechanistic studies in murine models have garnered direct experimental support for a pathogenic role of CSF-1 and migration inhibitory factor in LN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B91">91</abbr><abbr bid="B92">92</abbr><abbr bid="B93">93</abbr><abbr bid="B94">94</abbr><abbr bid="B95">95</abbr><abbr bid="B96">96</abbr><abbr bid="B97">97</abbr><abbr bid="B98">98</abbr></abbrgrp>. Other cytokines that have been shown to be important for antibody-mediated renal disease and/or LN include IL-1, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF&#945;, as reviewed elsewhere <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B99">99</abbr></abbrgrp>. Besides cytokines, a pathogenic role has also been assigned to two chemokines - monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and CXCL12. Both chemokines are elevated within diseased kidneys in mice and patients with LN, while mechanistic studies in mice support their role in disease pathogenesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B100">100</abbr><abbr bid="B101">101</abbr><abbr bid="B102">102</abbr><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr><abbr bid="B104">104</abbr><abbr bid="B105">105</abbr><abbr bid="B106">106</abbr><abbr bid="B107">107</abbr><abbr bid="B108">108</abbr><abbr bid="B109">109</abbr><abbr bid="B110">110</abbr><abbr bid="B111">111</abbr><abbr bid="B112">112</abbr><abbr bid="B113">113</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Since most of the above cytokines and chemokines can be elaborated systemically as well as locally within the kidneys, it remains to be established whether renal expression of any of these molecules is necessary for LN. The complex pathogenic cascades leading to SLE lend themselves to therapeutic intervention at multiple nodes, some systemic and some intrarenal, some of which are discussed in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>. Several of the indicated therapeutic strategies have only been tried in preclinical models of LN, whereas others are currently in active clinical trials, as discussed below. As we gain better insights into these molecular cascades and their druggability, the goal is to eventually identify the optimal combinatorial regimes that could potentially silence all critical pathways leading to disease.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Treatment of lupus nephritis</p>
         </st>
         <p>Before the advent of immunosuppressive regimens, a 2-year survival rate &lt;10% was observed in patients with diffuse PLN treated with low-dose steroids <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B114">114</abbr></abbrgrp>. Since then, the survival of patients with PLN has improved considerably due to earlier recognition of renal disease, aggressive immunosuppression and improved supportive care <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B115">115</abbr></abbrgrp>. Numerous prognostic factors have been identified in LN. Among others, nonwhite race (for example, black, Afro-Caribbean, Hispanic), poor socioeconomic status, uncontrolled hypertension, a high activity and chronicity index on kidney biopsy, renal impairment at baseline, poor initial response to therapy and nephritic relapses have been associated with poor outcome. Lack of adherence to therapy is an underestimated cause of treatment failure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B116">116</abbr><abbr bid="B117">117</abbr></abbrgrp>. The therapeutic goals for a patient with newly diagnosed LN are to achieve prompt renal remission using induction therapy, to avoid renal flares and chronic renal impairment using maintenance therapy, and to minimize treatment-associated toxicity. These goals are discussed further below.</p>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Induction therapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide</p>
            </st>
            <p>In 1986, Austin and colleagues from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published the results of a large randomized trial demonstrating the role of intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide (CYC) as an induction therapy, as listed in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B118">118</abbr></abbrgrp>. In a later NIH trial, combination therapy of i.v. methylprednisolone and i.v. CYC was shown to achieve a higher rate of renal remission than i.v. methylprednisolone alone <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B119">119</abbr></abbrgrp>. After a median follow-up of 11 years, none of the 20 patients who received combination therapy experienced end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Despite excellent efficacy, i.v. CYC treatment is associated with a high rate of premature ovarian failure (ranging from 38 to 52% of women at risk), increased risk of severe infections, a significant percentage of treatment failures and a high rate of renal relapse <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B120">120</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Randomized controlled studies in lupus nephritis</p></caption><tblbdy cols="6">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Drug and reference</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Description</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Primary endpoint</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Number and type of patients</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Follow-up duration</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Results</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="6">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>CYC <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B118">118</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to i.v. CYC vs. p.o. CYC, p.o. CYC + AZA, AZA, or prednisone</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Time to kidney failure</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 107, mainly class III and IV LN</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>7 years</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Time to ESRD is significantly longer in patients receiving i.v. CYC compared with those receiving steroids alone</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>CYC <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B121">121</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to high-dose (500 to 1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) monthly i.v. CYC for 6 months vs. low-dose i.v. CYC regimen 500 mg every 2 weeks &#215; six doses</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Treatment failure (doubling of sCr, absence of primary response or occurrence of a flare)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 90, class IV LN, 85% Caucasian</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>41 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Induction therapy with low-dose CYC is as effective as high-dose CYC</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B123">123</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to 6 months induction with MMF (2 g/day) or oral CYC (2.5 mg/kg/day) + prednisolone</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Incidence of complete remission</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 42, class IV LN, 100% Chinese</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>12 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Induction therapy with MMF is as effective as oral CYC</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B124">124</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to monthly i.v. CYC or MMF (3 g/day)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Incidence of complete remission at 6 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 140, class IV, 56% African American</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>6 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF was not inferior to i.v. CYC for induction of remission. In fact, MMF was more effective and better tolerated than i.v. CYC at inducing remission</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B125">125</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to MMF or monthly i.v. CYC for induction</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Prespecified decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio and improvement in sCr</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 370, classes III to V LN, 75% Caucasian</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>6 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF is not superior to i.v. CYC as induction therapy. No significant differences in response rate between the two groups. Adverse events were similar</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B126">126</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to quarterly i.v. CYC, MMF, or AZA for maintenance after induction with i.v. CYC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Incidence of patient and kidney survival</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 59, classes III and IV LN, African American and Hispanic</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>72 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF and AZA are both efficacious and safer than i.v. CYC for maintenance therapy</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>AZA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B126">126</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to quarterly i.v. CYC, MMF, or AZA for maintenance after induction with i.v. CYC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Incidence of patient and kidney survival</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 59, classes III and IV LN, African American and Hispanic</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>72 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MMF and AZA are both efficacious and safer than i.v. CYC for maintenance therapy</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>AZA, MMF <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B127">127</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to MMF, or AZA for maintenance after induction with low-dose i.v. CYC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Time to renal flares</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 103, classes III and IV LN, European</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Minimum 3 years</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No significant difference in renal flares with MMF and AZA as maintenance therapy</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rituximab (Rovin and colleagues, 2009)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Patients randomized to MMF or MMF + rituximab for induction therapy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Incidence of complete or partial renal remission</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 144, classes III and IV LN</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>52 weeks</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rituximab does not have an additive benefit to MMF for induction therapy</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>AZA, azathioprine; CYC, cyclophosphamide; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; i.v., intravenous; LN, lupus nephritis; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; p.o., oral; sCr, serum creatinine.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
            <p>In order to reduce total CYC exposure and toxicity, low-dose intermittent i.v. CYC was next investigated. The Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial compared a NIH-like high-dose regimen of i.v. CYC (six monthly pulses followed by two quarterly pulses) with the Euro-Lupus low-dose regimen (six pulses of i.v. CYC every 2 weeks at a fixed dose of 500 mg) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B121">121</abbr></abbrgrp>. The rates of renal remission were not statistically different between the two groups, but treatment-related adverse effects were less frequent with the reduced-dose regimen. Limitations of the Euro-Lupus trial include a population with relatively milder renal disease (mean creatinine 1 to 1.3 mg/dl; mean proteinuria 2.5 to 3.5 g/day for both groups), with almost 85% of the patients being Caucasian. Nevertheless, low-dose i.v. CYC is an option - particularly for low-risk Caucasians with less severe PLN.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Noncyclophosphamide induction regimens: mycophenolate mofetil</p>
            </st>
            <p>Recently, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a promising alternative therapy for both induction and maintenance treatment of LN. Mycophenolic acid, the active metabolite of MMF, is an inhibitor of the rate-limiting enzyme (inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase) involved in <it>de novo </it>purine synthesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B122">122</abbr></abbrgrp>. As lymphocytes do not possess a salvage pathway for the generation of these nucleotides, MMF results in selective blockade of B-cell and T-cell proliferation. Unlike CYC, mycophenolic acid has little impact on other tissues with high proliferative activity (for example, neutrophils, skin, intestine, bone marrow, gonads), which do possess a salvage pathway for nucleotide synthesis. This accounts for the metabolite's more favorable toxicity profile compared with CYC, and this renders MMF particularly attractive.</p>
            <p>As listed in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>, Chan and colleagues randomized 42 patients with PLN to 6 months of induction with MMF (2 g/day) or oral CYC (2.5 mg/kg/day), both with concurrent oral prednisolone <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B123">123</abbr></abbrgrp>. During the maintenance phase, those patients in the MMF arm continued the drug at a reduced dose (1 g/day) and those in the CYC arm switched to azathioprine (AZA) (1.5 mg/kg/day) for 6 months. This study suggested that induction treatment with MMF was as effective as oral CYC, but with fewer side effects. Although this study included only Chinese patients and excluded patients with poor prognostic indicators, a more recent study has demonstrated the increased efficacy of MMF induction in a high-risk, multiracial, American population in which 56% of the patients were African American <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B124">124</abbr></abbrgrp> (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Limitations of the latter study included its short follow-up duration, the crossover design and the fact that patients with rapidly progressive renal failure were excluded.</p>
            <p>Later on, another US study, the Aspreva Lupus Management Study, comprising high risk population with proliferative LN demonstrated similar efficacies of MMF and intravenous CYC as induction therapies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B125">125</abbr></abbrgrp> (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Furthermore, it was observed that, race, ethnicity and geographical region may affect treatment response; more Black and Hispanic patients responded to MMF than i.v. CYC. As the study was not designed for this sub-group analysis, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about their importance.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Maintenance therapies</p>
            </st>
            <p>Once a patient has attained remission, immunosuppression is given to help maintain remission, to prevent relapse, and to decrease the risk of developing ESRD. In the NIH trials, i.v. CYC at 3-month intervals for 18 to 24 months was used as maintenance therapy <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B118">118</abbr></abbrgrp>. In the past decade, sequential regimens of short-term CYC induction therapy, followed either by MMF or AZA maintenance, have proven to be efficacious and safe, with reduced hazards, compared with long-term exposure to CYC. Using a similar regime, Contreras and colleagues have reported similar findings in a randomized controlled study that included a large number of high-risk non-Caucasian patients, predominantly African Americans and Hispanics <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B126">126</abbr></abbrgrp> (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). In a recently concluded Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial multi-center trial (MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial) comprising 105 patient with proliferative LN, no significant difference in renal flares was observed between AZA and MMF as maintenance therapy over 3 years of follow up <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B127">127</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Another trial comparing MMF against AZA as remission-maintaining treatment for PLN following induction with a short course of intravenous CYC, the maintenance phase of the Aspreva Lupus Management Study <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B125">125</abbr></abbrgrp>, has recently been concluded and the results were presented at the American Society of Nephrology Meeting in 2010. It did not show any difference in renal flares between the two maintenance therapies (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Adjunctive therapy</p>
            </st>
            <p>As co-morbidities can significantly worsen outcome, these have to be actively managed in LN. Accelerated atherogenesis and coronary vascular disease are now recognized complications of SLE <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B128">128</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recognized risk factors include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, nephrotic syndrome, prolonged corticosteroid use, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and, in some cases, the vascular risks associated with chronic kidney disease. This underscores the importance of aggressively managing these modifiable risk factors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B129">129</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although few data are available specifically for patients with LN, it appears prudent to apply the knowledge gleaned from studying the general population with chronic kidney disease. Tight blood pressure control, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers, and correction of dyslipidemia are thus strongly recommended. Moreover, patients with chronic kidney disease should be screened and treated for complications such as anemia and bone and mineral disease (secondary hyperparathyroidism, hyperphosphatemia, vitamin D deficiency). In addition, measures should be taken to prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, including the use of calcium, vitamin D supplements, and bisphosphonates when necessary <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B130">130</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Novel approaches in the treatment for PLN</p>
            </st>
            <p>Despite recent strides in the treatment of LN, about 20% of patients do not respond but progress to ESRD. Moreover, toxicity of the current immunosuppressive regimens remains unacceptably high. With a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying LN, as discussed above (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), several newer and targeted therapeutic approaches are currently being tested, aimed at improved efficacy and reduced toxicity. These include LPJ394, rituximab, epratuzumab, belimumab, and abatacept, as summarized in Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>. This targeted therapy constitutes another area of research that is rapidly burgeoning with ongoing contributions from academia and from industry. As ongoing efforts in transcriptomics and proteomics further elucidate the molecular basis of lupus pathogenesis, the drugs that dominate the therapeutic landscape are likely to evolve rapidly.</p>
            <tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Novel therapeutic regimes in lupus nephritis targeting specific pathogenic molecules</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Drug and reference</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Description of drug or target</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Mechanism of action</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Details of trial</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Outcome of trial</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>LPJ394 (riquent, abetimus sodium) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B131">131</abbr><abbr bid="B132">132</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Four dsDNA helices coupled to polyethylene scaffold</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Neutralizes anti-DNA antibodies in serum and tolerizes anti-DNA B cells</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 230, classes III to V lupus nephritis; randomized, placebo-controlled, for 76 weeks</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Anti-DNA and complement profiles improved with LJP394, but no significant difference in time to renal flares between the two groups</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rituximab <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B133">133</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chimeric antibody to CD20 on B cells</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Agent targets and silences or removes B cells (some of which produce autoantibodies)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 10 lupus nephritis patients, 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, 4 weekly infusions, + oral CS; duration 12 months</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>5/10 achieved complete remission sustained for 1 year; 3/10 had partial remission</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Epratuzumab <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B134">134</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Humanized antibody to CD22 on B cells</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Agent targets and silences or removes B cells (some of which produce autoantibodies)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 14 (4 with nephritis); open-label study. Four doses of 360 mg/m<sup>2 </sup>given every 2 weeks; duration 32 weeks</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total BILAG scores decreased by &#8805;50% in all 14 patients at some point during the study. It was well tolerated</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Belimumab (lymphostat B) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B135">135</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Humanized antibody to Blys (or BAFF)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Agent blocks activation of B cells by countering Blys activation of B cells</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 449 (22 to 35% with nephritis); phase II randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Patients receive placebo or 1, 4 or 10 mg/kg belimumab at days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days + standard-of-care treatment; duration 52 weeks</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No significant differences in primary end-points (reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI scores or time to renal flares). However, patients on belimumab had significantly better physicians' subjective assessment scores and Short Form 36 scores)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Orencia (abatacept) (<url>www.clinicaltrials.gov</url> ID: NCT00774852)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Fusion protein of CTLA4 linked to Fc portion of human IgG<sub>1</sub></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Agent blocks T-cell:B-cell cross-talk by blocking CD28-CD80/CD86 interactions</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 100; randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase II multicenter trial of CTLA4Ig (abatacept) plus cyclophosphamide vs. cyclophosphamide alone in the treatment of lupus nephritis</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Currently recruiting</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rontalizumab (<url>www.clinicaltrials.gov</url> ID: NCT00962832)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Humanized antibody to type 1 interferon</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Agent blocks the function of the cytokine, interferon type 1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 210; phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rontalizumab in patients with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Active: not recruiting patients at present</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MEDI-545 (<url>www.clinicaltrials.gov</url> ID: NCT00657189)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Fully human antibody to IFN-&#945;</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Agent blocks the function of the cytokine, interferon type 1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>n </it>= 80; phase 2A, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, paralleldose study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple subcutaneous doses of MEDI-545, in subjects with SLE</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Active: not recruiting patients at present</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>BILAG, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group; CS, corticosteroids; SELENA, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SLEDAI, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Treatment of resistant lupus nephritis</p>
            </st>
            <p>While there has been significant improvement in how we manage LN, up to 20% of patients with LN are refractory to initial induction treatment, while 30 to 50% of patients still progress to ESRD <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B136">136</abbr></abbrgrp>. Many of these patients have poor prognostic factors including African American race, delayed initiation of treatment, poor compliance, and arterial hypertension at presentation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B137">137</abbr></abbrgrp>. More aggressive CYC regimens have been tried in these patients. One method involves the use of oral CYC instead of i.v. CYC. As the cumulative dose is higher in patients who receive daily oral dosing, it may be expected to be more effective albeit being more toxic; hence, this treatment regime should be limited to 6 months and should only be given to patients with multiple poor prognostic factors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B138">138</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Intravenous immunoglobulin</p>
            </st>
            <p>Intravenous immunoglobulin is another modality that has been tested. The efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in controlling disease activity and ameliorating classical disease manifestations ranges from 33 to 100% in different case series surveyed in a recent meta-analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B139">139</abbr></abbrgrp>. Other analyses have documented similar positive results, with particular improvements in the clinical and histological readouts of nephritis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B140">140</abbr></abbrgrp>. Despite encouraging reports describing the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in SLE, most of the data are based on case reports and small series. Furthermore, the long-term efficacy, optimal dosage and duration of therapy of intravenous immunoglobulin in LN remain to be established. Nevertheless, intravenous immunoglobulin can be considered in patients with LN either as salvage immunotherapy in severe cases that are nonresponsive or nontolerant to conventional treatment or in patients who experience severe infectious complications.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Calcineurin inhibitors</p>
            </st>
            <p>Open-labeled uncontrolled studies have reported efficacy and tolerability of cyclosporin A in the treatment of PLN <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B141">141</abbr></abbrgrp>. No published comparative trials between CYC and cyclosporin A in adult SLE patients are currently available. In an open study of 11 patients with LN, eight of whom were resistant or intolerant to CYC or AZA, significant improvement in proteinuria and anti-dsDNA titers was reported after treatment with cyclosporin A for 12 months <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B142">142</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Immunoablative therapy</p>
            </st>
            <p>Immunoablative therapy (that is, daily high doses of CYC followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is another option that can be entertained in severe refractory LN. Clinical remissions have been observed in about 65% of cases <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B143">143</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, the relatively high incidence of toxicities and mortality remains a concern.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>LN remains a major manifestation of SLE, as 60% of SLE patients may develop this end-organ involvement. The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of LN have been well studied over the past few decades. The 2003 addition to the ISN/RPS classification of the modified WHO schema of histological classification of LN has significantly improved how the disease is classified, managed and prognosticated. In terms of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms, we have gained significant insights regarding the cells and molecules that orchestrate the systemic as well as the target organ phases of the disease. How we manage LN has also evolved significantly over the past decade, thanks to multiple clinical trials. Currently, the optimal induction therapy appears to be i.v. CYC or oral mycophenolate, while maintenance is best achieved using oral mycophenolate, AZA or i.v. CYC. Newer targeted therapeutics built upon recent molecular insights are likely to revolutionize how LN is managed in the clinic in the coming years.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Abbreviations</p>
         </st>
         <p>AZA: azathioprine; BAFF: B-cell activating factor; CD40L: CD40 ligand; CSF-1: colony-stimulating factor-1; CYC: cyclophosphamide; DC: dendritic cell; dsDNA: double-stranded DNA; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; GN: glomerulonephritis; IFN: interferon; IL: interleukin; ISN/RPS: International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society; i.v., intravenous; LN: lupus nephritis; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; NIH: National Institutes of Health; PLN: proliferative lupus nephritis; RANTES: regulated upon activation: normal T-cell expressed and secreted; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; TGF&#946;: transforming growth factor beta; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; WHO: World Health Organization.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Secondary glomerular disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Appel</snm><fnm>GB</fnm></au><au><snm>Radhakrishnan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>D'Agati</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>The Kidney</source><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Saunders</publisher><editor>Brenner BM</editor><edition>8</edition><pubdate>2007</pubdate><fpage>1067</fpage><lpage>1148</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Clinical trials in SLE: lessons learned from the past as we proceed to the future - the EULAR recommendations for the management of SLE and the use of end-points in clinical trials</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bertsias</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Gordon</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Boumpas</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au></aug><source>Lupus</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>437</fpage><lpage>442</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1177/0961203308090031</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18490423</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Renal damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative analysis of different age groups</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mak</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Mok</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Chu</snm><fnm>WP</fnm></au><au><snm>To</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>SN</fnm></au><au><snm>Au</snm><fnm>TC</fnm></au></aug><source>Lupus</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1177/0961203306074469</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17283582</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Demographic differences in the outcome of SLE nephritis: a retrospective analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Seligman</snm><fnm>VA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lum</snm><fnm>RF</fnm></au><au><snm>Olson</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Criswell</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Med</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>112</volume><fpage>726</fpage><lpage>729</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01118-X</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12079714</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cameron</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>413</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10215343</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Clinical evaluation and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Austin</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au></aug><source>Lupus</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>618</fpage><lpage>621</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1191/096120398678920749</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9884099</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>McCluskey</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Pathology Decennial 1966-1975</source><publisher>East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century Crofts</publisher><editor>Sommers SC</editor><pubdate>1975</pubdate><fpage>435</fpage><lpage>450</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: identification of specific pathologic features affecting renal outcome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Austin</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Muenz</snm><fnm>LR</fnm></au><au><snm>Joyce</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Antonovych</snm><fnm>TT</fnm></au><au><snm>Balow</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1984</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>689</fpage><lpage>695</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1984.75</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">6482173</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosis revisited</p></title><aug><au><snm>Weening</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>D'Agati</snm><fnm>VD</fnm></au><au><snm>Schwartz</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>241</fpage><lpage>250</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.ASN.0000108969.21691.5D</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14747370</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Interobserver reproducibility and application of the INS/RPS classification of lupus nephritis - a UK-wide study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Furness</snm><fnm>PN</fnm></au><au><snm>Taub</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Surg Pathol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>1030</fpage><lpage>1035</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00000478-200608000-00015</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16861976</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>The outcome and a new ISN/RPS 2003 classification of lupus nephritis in Japanese</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yokoyama</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Wada</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Hara</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamahana</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakaya</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Kobayashi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kokubo</snm><fnm>KS</fnm></au><au><snm>Iwata</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoshimoto</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Shimizu</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Sakai</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Furuichi</snm><fnm>KT</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>2382</fpage><lpage>2388</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.66027.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15569330</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Davidson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Aranow</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Curr Opin Rheumatol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>468</fpage><lpage>475</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16896284</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Murine lupus genes target 3 checkpoints in disease development - central tolerance in the adaptive immune system, peripheral amplification by innate immunity, and end-organ inflammation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kanta</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Mohan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Genes Immun</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>390</fpage><lpage>396</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/gene.2009.6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19262576</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Antibodies to DNA</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hahn</snm><fnm>BH</fnm></au></aug><source>N Engl J Med</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>338</volume><fpage>1359</fpage><lpage>1368</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1056/NEJM199805073381906</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9571257</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Monoclonal antibody identification of infiltrating mononuclear leukocytes in lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>D'Agati</snm><fnm>VD</fnm></au><au><snm>Appel</snm><fnm>GB</fnm></au><au><snm>Estes</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Knowles</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Pirani</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>573</fpage><lpage>581</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1986.223</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3537453</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Autoreactive kidney-infiltrating T-cell clones in murine lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>D&#237;az Gallo</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Jevnikar</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Brennan</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Florquin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Pacheco-Silva</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Kelley</snm><fnm>VR</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>851</fpage><lpage>859</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1992.360</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1360551</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Lupus nephritis in the absence of renal major histocompatibility complex class I and class II molecules</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mukherjee</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhong</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Yin</snm><fnm>ZQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Roopenian</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Jevnikar</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>2445</fpage><lpage>2452</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8959638</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Murine lupus in MRL/lpr mice lacking CD4 or CD8 T cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Koh</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Ho</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Rahemtulla</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Fung-Leung</snm><fnm>WP</fnm></au><au><snm>Griesser</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Mak</snm><fnm>TW</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Immunol</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>2558</fpage><lpage>2562</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/eji.1830250923</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7589126</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody therapy suppresses autoimmune disease in MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jabs</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Burek</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au><au><snm>Hu</snm><fnm>Q</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuppers</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Prendergast</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Cell Immunol</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>141</volume><fpage>496</fpage><lpage>507</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0008-8749(92)90166-M</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1576659</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Effects of early and late treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody on autoimmune disease in MRL/MP-lpr/lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jabs</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuppers</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Saboori</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Burek</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au><au><snm>Enger</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Prendergast</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Cell Immunol</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>154</volume><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/cimm.1994.1057</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7907009</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>CD4<sup>+ </sup>T cells recognizing specific antigen deposited in glomeruli cause glomerulonephritis-like kidney injury</p></title><aug><au><snm>Radeke</snm><fnm>HH</fnm></au><au><snm>Tschernig</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Karulin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Schumm</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Emancipator</snm><fnm>SN</fnm></au><au><snm>Resch</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Tary-Lehmann</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Immunol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>104</volume><fpage>161</fpage><lpage>173</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/clim.2002.5246</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12165277</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Hyperexpression of CD40 ligand by B and T cells in human lupus and its role in pathogenic autoantibody production</p></title><aug><au><snm>Desai-Mehta</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Lu</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ramsey-Goldman</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Datta</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>97</volume><fpage>2063</fpage><lpage>2073</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1172/JCI118643</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">507281</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8621796</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Increased expression of CD40 ligand on systemic lupus erythematosus lymphocytes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Koshy</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Berge</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Crow</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>98</volume><fpage>826</fpage><lpage>837</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1172/JCI118855</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">507493</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8698875</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Peripheral blood lymphocytes in SLE - hyperexpression of CD154 on T and B lymphocytes and increased number of double negative T cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Devi</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Noordin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Krausz</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Davies</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Autoimmun</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>471</fpage><lpage>475</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jaut.1998.0213</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9802931</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Anti-CD40 ligand antibody treatment of SNF1 mice with established nephritis: preservation of kidney function</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kalled</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Cutler</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Datta</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>160</volume><fpage>2158</fpage><lpage>2165</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9498753</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Effects of anti-CD154 treatment on B cells in murine systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Schiffer</snm><fnm>LE</fnm></au><au><snm>Mihara</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Akkerman</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Hiromatsu</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Davidson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>495</fpage><lpage>506</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.10929</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12571860</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>CD40 expression by human monocytes: regulation by cytokines and activation of monocytes by the ligand for CD40</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alderson</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Armitage</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Tough</snm><fnm>TW</fnm></au><au><snm>Strockbine</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Fanslow</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au><au><snm>Spriggs</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>178</volume><fpage>669</fpage><lpage>674</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.178.2.669</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2191134</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7688031</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Activation of human dendritic cells through CD40 crosslinking</p></title><aug><au><snm>Caux</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Massacrier</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vanbervliet</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Dubois</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>van Kooten</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Durand</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Banchereau</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>180</volume><fpage>1263</fpage><lpage>1272</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.180.4.1263</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2191669</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7523569</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Immunohistologic analysis of renal CD40 and CD40L expression in lupus nephritis and other glomerulonephritides</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yellin</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>D'Agati</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Parkinson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Han</snm><fnm>AS</fnm></au><au><snm>Szema</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Baum</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Estes</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Szabolcs</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Chess</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>124</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.1780400117</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">9008608</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Distinct T cell/renal tubular epithelial cell interactions define differential chemokine production: implications for tubulointerstitial injury in chronic glomerulonephritides</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kuroiwa</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Schlimgen</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Illei</snm><fnm>GG</fnm></au><au><snm>McInnes</snm><fnm>IB</fnm></au><au><snm>Boumpas</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>164</volume><fpage>3323</fpage><lpage>3329</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10706726</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Possible role for CD40-CD40L in the regulation of interstitial infiltration in the kidney</p></title><aug><au><snm>van Kooten</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Gerritsma</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Paape</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>van Es</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Banchereau</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Daha</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>711</fpage><lpage>721</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1997.102</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">9067903</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Cytokine balance in kidney tissue from lupus nephritis patients</p></title><aug><au><snm>Uhm</snm><fnm>WS</fnm></au><au><snm>Na</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Song</snm><fnm>GW</fnm></au><au><snm>Jung</snm><fnm>SS</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Park</snm><fnm>MH</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoo</snm><fnm>DH</fnm></au></aug><source>Rheumatology (Oxford)</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>935</fpage><lpage>938</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/rheumatology/keg255</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Up-regulation of IL-18 and predominance of a Th1 immune response is a hallmark of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Calvani</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Richards</snm><fnm>HB</fnm></au><au><snm>Tucci</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Pannarale</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Silvestris</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Exp Immunol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>138</volume><fpage>171</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02588.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1809179</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15373921</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Predominance of Th1 immune response in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Masutani</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Akahoshi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tsuruya</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Tokumoto</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ninomiya</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Kohsaka</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Fukuda</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanai</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakashima</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Otsuka</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Hirakata</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>44</volume><fpage>2097</fpage><lpage>2106</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9&lt;2097::AID-ART360&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11592372</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Overexpression of interleukin-12 and T helper 1 predominance in lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tucci</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Lombardi</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Richards</snm><fnm>HB</fnm></au><au><snm>Dammacco</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Silvestris</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Exp Immunol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>154</volume><fpage>247</fpage><lpage>254</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03758.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2612719</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18795942</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Inflammatory cytokine gene expression in the urinary sediment of patients with lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au><au><snm>Tam</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Lai</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Chow</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lai</snm><fnm>KB</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>PK</fnm></au><au><snm>Szeto</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>1326</fpage><lpage>1331</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.11062</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12746905</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>In vivo treatment of (NZB &#215; NZW) F1 lupus-like nephritis with monoclonal antibody to gamma interferon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jacob</snm><fnm>CO</fnm></au><au><snm>van der Meide</snm><fnm>PH</fnm></au><au><snm>McDevitt</snm><fnm>HO</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>166</volume><fpage>798</fpage><lpage>803</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.166.3.798</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2188698</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3114409</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Roles of interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 in murine lupus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Peng</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Moslehi</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Craft</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>99</volume><fpage>1936</fpage><lpage>1946</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1172/JCI119361</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">508018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9109438</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Interferon-&#947; is required for lupus-like disease and lymphoaccumulation in MRL-lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Balomenos</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Rumold</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Theoilopoulos</snm><fnm>AN</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>364</fpage><lpage>371</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1172/JCI750</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">508575</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9435308</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>IL-18 cDNA vaccination protects mice from spontaneous lupus-like autoimmune disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boss&#249;</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Neumann</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Del Giudice</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Ciaramella</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Gloaguen</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Fantuzzi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Dinarello</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Di Carlo</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Musiani</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Meroni</snm><fnm>PL</fnm></au><au><snm>Caselli</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Ruggiero</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Boraschi</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>100</volume><fpage>14181</fpage><lpage>14816</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.2336094100</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">283566</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14615579</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Roles of IL-4 and IL-12 in the development of lupus in NZB/W F1 mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nakajima</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Hirose</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Yagita</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Okumura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>158</volume><fpage>1466</fpage><lpage>1472</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9013993</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Interleukin-4 transgenic mice develop glomerulosclerosis independent of immunoglobulin deposition</p></title><aug><au><snm>R&#252;ger</snm><fnm>BM</fnm></au><au><snm>Erb</snm><fnm>KJ</fnm></au><au><snm>He</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Lane</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>PF</fnm></au><au><snm>Hasan</snm><fnm>Q</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Immunol</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>2698</fpage><lpage>2703</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/1521-4141(200009)30:9&lt;2698::AID-IMMU2698&gt;3.0.CO;2-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11009105</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Differential contribution of IL-4 and STAT6 vs. STAT4 to the development of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Singh</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au><au><snm>Saxena</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Zang</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Finkelman</snm><fnm>FD</fnm></au><au><snm>Witte</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Jacob</snm><fnm>CO</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>170</volume><fpage>4818</fpage><lpage>4825</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2291553</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12707364</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>IL-4 and many roads to lupuslike autoimmunity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Singh</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Immunol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>108</volume><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00145-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12921752</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Quantification of dendritic cell subsets in human renal tissue under normal and pathological conditions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Woltman</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>de Fijter</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Zuidwijk</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Vlug</snm><fnm>AG</fnm></au><au><snm>Bajema</snm><fnm>IM</fnm></au><au><snm>van der Kooij</snm><fnm>SW</fnm></au><au><snm>van Ham</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>van Kooten</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>71</volume><fpage>1001</fpage><lpage>1008</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.ki.5002187</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17361115</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Identification and functional characterization of dendritic cells in the healthy murine kidney and in experimental glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kr&#252;ger</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Benke</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Eitner</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Lang</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wirtz</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hamilton-Williams</snm><fnm>EE</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Giese</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>M&#252;ller-Newen</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Floege</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kurts</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>613</fpage><lpage>621</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.ASN.0000114553.36258.91</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14978163</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>CX(3) CR1(+) interstitial dendritic cells form a contiguous network throughout the entire kidney</p></title><aug><au><snm>Soos</snm><fnm>TJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Sims</snm><fnm>TN</fnm></au><au><snm>Barisoni</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Littman</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Dustin</snm><fnm>ML</fnm></au><au><snm>Nelson</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>70</volume><fpage>591</fpage><lpage>596</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16760907</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Immature myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells infiltrate renal tubulointerstitium in patients with lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fiore</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Castellano</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Blasi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Capobianco</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Loverre</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Montinaro</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Netti</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Torres</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Manno</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Grandaliano</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Ranieri</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Schena</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au><au><snm>Gesualdo</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Immunol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>259</fpage><lpage>265</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.molimm.2007.04.029</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17570528</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>Glomerular accumulation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in active lupus nephritis: role of interleukin-18</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tucci</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Quatraro</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Lombardi</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Pellegrino</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Dammacco</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Silvestris</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>58</volume><fpage>251</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.23186</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18163476</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have reduced numbers of circulating natural interferon-alpha-producing cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cederblad</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Blomberg</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Vallin</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Perers</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Alm</snm><fnm>GV</fnm></au><au><snm>R&#246;nnblom</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>J Autoimmun</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>465</fpage><lpage>470</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jaut.1998.0215</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9802930</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>Blood dendritic cells and DC-poietins in systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gill</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Blanco</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Arce</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Pascual</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Banchereau</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Palucka</snm><fnm>AK</fnm></au></aug><source>Hum Immunol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>1172</fpage><lpage>1180</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0198-8859(02)00756-5</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12480261</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (natural interferon-alpha/beta-producing cells) accumulate in cutaneous lupus erythematosus lesions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Farkas</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Beiske</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Lund-Johansen</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Brandtzaeg</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Jahnsen</snm><fnm>FL</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Pathol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>159</volume><fpage>237</fpage><lpage>243</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61689-6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1850412</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11438470</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>Role for nephritogenic T cells in lupus glomerulonephritis: progression to renal failure is accompanied by T cell activation and expansion in regional lymph nodes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bagavant</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Deshmukh</snm><fnm>US</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Ly</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Fu</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>177</volume><fpage>8258</fpage><lpage>8265</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17114504</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B54"><title><p>Activated renal macrophages are markers of disease onset and disease remission in lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schiffer</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Bethunaickan</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Ramanujam</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Schiffer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tao</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Madaio</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Bottinger</snm><fnm>EP</fnm></au><au><snm>Davidson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>180</volume><fpage>1938</fpage><lpage>1947</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2587994</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18209092</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B55"><title><p>Periglomerular accumulation of dendritic cells in rat crescentic glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fujinaka</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Nameta</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kovalenko</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Matsuki</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Kato</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nishimoto</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoshida</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Yaoita</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Naito</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kihara</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Tomizawa</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamamoto</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nephrol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17557270</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B56"><title><p>Renal dendritic cells stimulate IL-10 production and attenuate nephrotoxic nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Scholz</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Lukacs-Kornek</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Specht</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kiss</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Eitner</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Floege</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Groene</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Kurts</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>527</fpage><lpage>537</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1681/ASN.2007060684</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2391058</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18235094</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B57"><title><p>Dendritic cells and the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Monrad</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaplan</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunol Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF02685895</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">17695248</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B58"><title><p>CCR and CC chemokine expression in relation to Flt3 ligand-induced renal dendritic cell mobilization</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coates</snm><fnm>PT</fnm></au><au><snm>Colvin</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au><au><snm>Ranganathan</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Duncan</snm><fnm>FJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>YY</fnm></au><au><snm>Shufesky</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Zahorchak</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au><au><snm>Morelli</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomson</snm><fnm>AW</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>1907</fpage><lpage>1917</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00965.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15496162</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B59"><title><p>Chemokines enhance immunity by guiding naive CD8<sup>+ </sup>T cells to sites of CD4<sup>+ </sup>T cell-dendritic cell interaction</p></title><aug><au><snm>Castellino</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>AY</fnm></au><au><snm>Altan-Bonnet</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Stoll</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Scheinecker</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Germain</snm><fnm>RN</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>440</volume><fpage>890</fpage><lpage>895</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature04651</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16612374</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B60"><title><p>The interplay of chemokines and dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tucci</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Calvani</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Richards</snm><fnm>HB</fnm></au><au><snm>Quatraro</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Silvestris</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann N Y Acad Sci</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>1051</volume><fpage>421</fpage><lpage>432</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1196/annals.1361.084</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16126984</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B61"><title><p>Leukocyte analysis using monoclonal antibodies in human glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hooke</snm><fnm>DH</fnm></au><au><snm>Gee</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>31</volume><fpage>964</fpage><lpage>972</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1987.93</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3495689</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B62"><title><p>Lupus nephritis: correlation of interstitial cells with glomerular function</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alexopoulos</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Seron</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Hartley</snm><fnm>RB</fnm></au><au><snm>Cameron</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>109</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1990.14</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1967662</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B63"><title><p>Association between leukocyte infiltration and development of glomerulosclerosis in experimental lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kootstra</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Sutmuller</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Baelde</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>de Heer</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Bruijn</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Pathol</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>184</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199802)184:2&lt;219::AID-PATH990&gt;3.0.CO;2-9</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9602715</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B64"><title><p>Local macrophage proliferation in the pathogenesis of glomerular crescent formation in rat anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Paterson</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Exp Immunol</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>110</volume><fpage>233</fpage><lpage>240</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2265489</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">9367407</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B65"><title><p>Abrogation of macrophage-dependent injury in experimental glomerulonephritis in the rabbit. Use of an antimacrophage serum</p></title><aug><au><snm>Holdsworth</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Neale</snm><fnm>TJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wilson</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>1981</pubdate><volume>68</volume><fpage>686</fpage><lpage>698</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1172/JCI110304</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">370850</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7276168</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B66"><title><p>Conditional ablation of macrophages halts progression of crescentic glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Duffield</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Tipping</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Kipari</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Cailhier</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Clay</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Lang</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bonventre</snm><fnm>JV</fnm></au><au><snm>Hughes</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Pathol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>167</volume><fpage>1207</fpage><lpage>1219</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61209-6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1603796</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16251406</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B67"><title><p>Adoptive transfer studies demonstrate that macrophages can induce proteinuria and mesangial cell proliferation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ikezumi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hurst</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Masaki</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Paterson</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>83</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12472771</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B68"><title><p>Macrophage-induced glomerular injury. Cell transfer studies in passive autologous antiglomerular basement membrane antibody-initiated experimental glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Holdsworth</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Neale</snm><fnm>TJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Lab Invest</source><pubdate>1984</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>180</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">6611452</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B69"><title><p>Contributions of intrinsic renal cells to crescentic glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tipping</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Timoshanko</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Nephron Exp Nephrol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>e173</fpage><lpage>e178</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000088165</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16155400</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B70"><title><p>Resident kidney cells and their involvement in glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Timoshanko</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Tipping</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au></aug><source>Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>353</fpage><lpage>362</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2174/1568010054022132</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16101545</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B71"><title><p>Major histocompatibility complex class II expression by intrinsic renal cells is required for crescentic glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kurts</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kontgen</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Holdsworth</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Tipping</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>188</volume><fpage>597</fpage><lpage>602</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.188.3.597</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2212465</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9687536</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B72"><title><p>TWEAK stimulation of kidney resident cells in the pathogenesis of graft versus host induced lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Molano</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Lakhani</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Aran</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Burkly</snm><fnm>LC</fnm></au><au><snm>Michaelson</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Putterman</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunol Lett</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>125</volume><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19573558</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B73"><title><p>Intrinsic renal cells are the major source of tumor necrosis factor contributing to renal injury in murine crescentic glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Timoshanko</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Sedgwick</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Holdsworth</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Tipping</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>1785</fpage><lpage>1793</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.ASN.0000073902.38428.33</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12819238</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B74"><title><p>Mesangial cells of lupus-prone mice are sensitive to chemokine production</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ka</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheng</snm><fnm>CW</fnm></au><au><snm>Shui</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>WM</fnm></au><au><snm>Chang</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>YC</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Res Ther</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>R67</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar2226</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2206365</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17617918</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B75"><title><p>Inhibition of mesangial cell nitric oxide in MRL/lpr mice by prostaglandin J2 and proliferator activation receptor-gamma agonists</p></title><aug><au><snm>Reilly</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Oates</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Cook</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Morrow</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Halushka</snm><fnm>PV</fnm></au><au><snm>Gilkeson</snm><fnm>GS</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>164</volume><fpage>1498</fpage><lpage>1504</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10640767</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B76"><title><p>Prostaglandin J(2) inhibition of mesangial cell iNOS expression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Reilly</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Oates</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Sudian</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Crosby</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au><au><snm>Halushka</snm><fnm>PV</fnm></au><au><snm>Gilkeson</snm><fnm>GS</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Immunol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>98</volume><fpage>337</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/clim.2000.4985</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11237557</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B77"><title><p>Expanded double negative T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus produce IL-17 and infiltrate the kidneys</p></title><aug><au><snm>Crisp&#237;n</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Oukka</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bayliss</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Cohen</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Beek</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Stillman</snm><fnm>IE</fnm></au><au><snm>Kyttaris</snm><fnm>VC</fnm></au><au><snm>Juang</snm><fnm>YT</fnm></au><au><snm>Tsokos</snm><fnm>GC</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>181</volume><fpage>8761</fpage><lpage>8766</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2596652</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19050297</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B78"><title><p>Low-dose peptide tolerance therapy of lupus generates plasmacytoid dendritic cells that cause expansion of autoantigen-specific regulatory T cells and contraction of inflammatory Th17 cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>HK</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Datta</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>178</volume><fpage>7849</fpage><lpage>7858</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17548623</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B79"><title><p>Interferon and granulopoiesis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Palucka</snm><fnm>AK</fnm></au><au><snm>Arce</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Cantrell</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Borvak</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Banchereau</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Pascual</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>197</volume><fpage>711</fpage><lpage>723</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.20021553</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2193846</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12642603</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B80"><title><p>Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Baechler</snm><fnm>EC</fnm></au><au><snm>Batliwalla</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Karypis</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaffney</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au><au><snm>Ortmann</snm><fnm>WA</fnm></au><au><snm>Espe</snm><fnm>KJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Shark</snm><fnm>KB</fnm></au><au><snm>Grande</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hughes</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Kapur</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Gregersen</snm><fnm>PK</fnm></au><au><snm>Behrens</snm><fnm>TW</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>100</volume><fpage>2610</fpage><lpage>2615</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0337679100</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">151388</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12604793</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B81"><title><p>Coordinate overexpression of interferon-alpha induced genes in systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kirou</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>George</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Louca</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Papagiannis</snm><fnm>IG</fnm></au><au><snm>Peterson</snm><fnm>MG</fnm></au><au><snm>Ly</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Woodward</snm><fnm>RN</fnm></au><au><snm>Fry</snm><fnm>KE</fnm></au><au><snm>Lau</snm><fnm>AY</fnm></au><au><snm>Prentice</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Wohlgemuth</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Crow</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>3958</fpage><lpage>3967</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.20798</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15593221</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B82"><title><p>Type I interferons produced by resident renal cells may promote end-organ disease in autoantibody-mediated glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fairhurst</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Xie</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Fu</snm><fnm>YY</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Boudreaux</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>XJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Cibotti</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Coyle</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Connolly</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Wakeland</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Mohan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>183</volume><fpage>6831</fpage><lpage>6838</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.0900742</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2876821</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19864599</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B83"><title><p>Transforming growth factor beta in disease: the dark side of tissue repair</p></title><aug><au><snm>Border</snm><fnm>WA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ruoslahti</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>90</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1172/JCI115821</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">443055</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1634602</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B84"><title><p>Increased steady-state levels of mRNA coding for extracellular matrix components in kidneys of NZB/W F1 mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nakamura</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Ebihara</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Shirato</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Tomino</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Koide</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Pathol</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>139</volume><fpage>437</fpage><lpage>450</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1886086</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1867327</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B85"><title><p>Effect of methylprednisolone on transforming growth factor-beta, insulin-like growth factor-I, and basic fibroblast growth factor gene expression in the kidneys of NZB/W F1 mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nakamura</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Ebihara</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Nagaoka</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Osada</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Tomino</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Koide</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Ren Physiol Biochem</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">7686676</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B86"><title><p>Role of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Taniguchi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Yorioka</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Masaki</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamashita</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Ito</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Ueda</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamakido</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>J Int Med Res</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">9100161</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B87"><title><p>Dual roles of immunoregulatory cytokine TGF-&#946; in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity-mediated organ damage</p></title><aug><au><snm>Saxena</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Lienesch</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bommireddy</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Azhar</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Doetschman</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Singh</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>180</volume><fpage>1903</fpage><lpage>1912</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2291535</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18209088</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B88"><title><p>Colony stimulating factor-1 in the induction of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bloom</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Florquin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Singer</snm><fnm>GG</fnm></au><au><snm>Brennan</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kelley</snm><fnm>VR</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>143</volume><fpage>1000</fpage><lpage>1009</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B89"><title><p>Tubules are the major site of M-CSF production in experimental kidney disease: correlation with local macrophage proliferation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Isbel</snm><fnm>NM</fnm></au><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Foti</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Hurst</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Stambe</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Paterson</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>60</volume><fpage>614</fpage><lpage>625</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.060002614.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11473644</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B90"><title><p>Increased macrophage colony-stimulating factor in neonatal and adult autoimmune MRL-lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yui</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Brissette</snm><fnm>WH</fnm></au><au><snm>Brennan</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Wuthrich</snm><fnm>RP</fnm></au><au><snm>Rubin-Kelley</snm><fnm>VE</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Pathol</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>139</volume><fpage>255</fpage><lpage>261</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1886069</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1867317</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B91"><title><p>Macrophage growth factors introduced into the kidney initiate renal injury</p></title><aug><au><snm>Naito</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokoyama</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>KJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Dranoff</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Mulligan</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kelley</snm><fnm>VR</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Med</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>297</fpage><lpage>312</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2230158</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8784783</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B92"><title><p>Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Paterson</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>XQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Isbel</snm><fnm>NM</fnm></au><au><snm>Metz</snm><fnm>CN</fnm></au><au><snm>Bucala</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>57</volume><fpage>499</fpage><lpage>509</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00869.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10652026</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B93"><title><p>De novo renal expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor during the development of rat crescentic glomerulonephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Meinhardt</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Paterson</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ng</snm><fnm>YY</fnm></au><au><snm>Bacher</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Bucala</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Pathol</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>149</volume><fpage>1119</fpage><lpage>1127</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1865205</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8863661</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B94"><title><p>Urine macrophage migration inhibitory factor in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Otukesh</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Chalian</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoseini</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Chalian</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Hooman</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Bedayat</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Yazdi</snm><fnm>RS</fnm></au><au><snm>Sabaghi</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Mahdavi</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Rheumatol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>26</volume><fpage>2105</fpage><lpage>2107</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10067-007-0632-z</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17479310</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B95"><title><p>Macrophage migration inhibitory factor deficiency attenuates macrophage recruitment, glomerulonephritis, and lethality in MRL/lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hoi</snm><fnm>AY</fnm></au><au><snm>Hickey</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hall</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamana</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>O'Sullivan</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>LL</fnm></au><au><snm>James</snm><fnm>WG</fnm></au><au><snm>Kitching</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Morand</snm><fnm>EF</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>177</volume><fpage>5687</fpage><lpage>5696</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17015758</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B96"><title><p>Transgene of MIF induces podocyte injury and progressive mesangial sclerosis in the mouse kidney</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sasaki</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Nishihira</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Ishibashi</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamasaki</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Obikane</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Echigoya</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sado</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Ninomiya</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Kobayashi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>65</volume><fpage>469</fpage><lpage>481</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00394.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14717917</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B97"><title><p>Reversal of established rat crescentic glomerulonephritis by blockade of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): potential role of MIF in regulating glucocorticoid production</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Patersonm</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ng</snm><fnm>YY</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Metz</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Bacher</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Meinhardt</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Bucala</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Med</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>413</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2230272</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">10780884</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B98"><title><p>The pathogenic role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in immunologically induced kidney disease in the rat</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Bacher</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolic-Paterson</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Metz</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Meinhardt</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Bucala</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkins</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>185</volume><fpage>1455</fpage><lpage>1465</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.185.8.1455</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2196273</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9126926</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B99"><title><p>Experimental anti-GBM disease as a tool for studying spontaneous lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fu</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Du</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Mohan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Immunol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>124</volume><fpage>109</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.clim.2007.05.007</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17640604</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B100"><title><p>Renal expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in lupus autoimmune mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zoja</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>XH</fnm></au><au><snm>Donadelli</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Abbate</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Testa</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Corna</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Taraboletti</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Vecchi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Dong</snm><fnm>QG</fnm></au><au><snm>Rollins</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bertani</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Remuzzi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>720</fpage><lpage>729</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9176841</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B101"><title><p>Chemokine expression precedes inflammatory cell infiltration and chemokine receptor and cytokine expression during the initiation of murine lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>P&#233;rez de Lema</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Maier</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Nieto</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Vielhauer</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Luckow</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Mampaso</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Schl&#246;ndorff</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>1369</fpage><lpage>1382</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11423566</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B102"><title><p>Glomerular expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is predictive of poor renal prognosis in pediatric lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Marks</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au><au><snm>Williams</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Tullus</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Sebire</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Nephrol Dial Transplant</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>3521</fpage><lpage>3526</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/ndt/gfn270</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18495743</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B103"><title><p>Intrarenal cytokine gene expression in lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au><au><snm>Lai</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Tam</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Chow</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lai</snm><fnm>KB</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>PK</fnm></au><au><snm>Szeto</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>886</fpage><lpage>892</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.2006.063123</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1955122</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17324967</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B104"><title><p>Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is excreted in excessive amounts in the urine of patients with lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Noris</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bernasconi</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Casiraghi</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Sozzani</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gotti</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Remuzzi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Mantovani</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Lab Invest</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>804</fpage><lpage>809</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">8558841</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B105"><title><p>Monitoring urinary levels of monocyte chemotactic and activating factor reflects disease activity of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wada</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokoyama</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Su</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au><au><snm>Mukaida</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Iwano</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Dohi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Sasaki</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Furuichi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Segawa</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Hisada</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohta</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Takasawa</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kobayashi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Matsushima</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>49</volume><fpage>761</fpage><lpage>767</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1996.105</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8648917</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B106"><title><p>Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-deficient mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lu</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Rutledge</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Gu</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Fiorillo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Lukacs</snm><fnm>NW</fnm></au><au><snm>Kunkel</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>North</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Gerard</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Rollins</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Med</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>187</volume><fpage>601</fpage><lpage>608</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1084/jem.187.4.601</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2212142</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9463410</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B107"><title><p>Antagonist of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 ameliorates the initiation and progression of lupus nephritis and renal vasculitis in MRL/lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hasegawa</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Kohno</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sasaki</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Inoue</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ito</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Terada</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hieshima</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Maruyama</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Miyazaki</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoshie</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Nose</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Fujita</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>2555</fpage><lpage>2566</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.11231</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">13130475</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B108"><title><p>Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates nephritis in MRL/lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shimizu</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakashima</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Masutani</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Inoue</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Miyake</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Akahoshi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tanaka</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Egashira</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Hirakata</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Otsuka</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Harada</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Rheumatology (Oxford)</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>43</volume><fpage>1121</fpage><lpage>1128</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/rheumatology/keh277</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B109"><title><p>Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 activates a regional Th1 immunoresponse in nephritis of MRL/lpr mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shimizu</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakashima</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Karube</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohshima</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Egashira</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Exp Rheumatol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">15895897</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B110"><title><p>Late onset of treatment with a chemokine receptor CCR1 antagonist prevents progression of lupus nephritis in MRL-Fas(lpr) mice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Anders</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Belemezova</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Eis</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Segerer</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Vielhauer</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Perez de Lema</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Kretzler</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Cohen</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au><au><snm>Frink</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Horuk</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Hudkins</snm><fnm>KL</fnm></au><au><snm>Alpers</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Mampaso</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Schl&#246;ndorff</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>1504</fpage><lpage>1513</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.ASN.0000130082.67775.60</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15153561</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B111"><title><p>Targeting the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chong</snm><fnm>BF</fnm></au><au><snm>Mohan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Expert Opin Ther Targets</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>1147</fpage><lpage>1153</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1517/14728220903196761</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19670960</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B112"><title><p>CXCR4/CXCL12 hyperexpression plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of lupus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Fairhurst</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Tus</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Subramanian</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Igarashi</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>XJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Batteux</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Wakeland</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Mohan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>182</volume><fpage>4448</fpage><lpage>4458</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.0801920</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2946082</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19299746</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B113"><title><p>Role of the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 in autoantibody production and nephritis in murine lupus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Balabanian</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Couderc</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Bouchet-Delbos</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Amara</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Berrebi</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Foussat</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Baleux</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Portier</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Durand-Gasselin</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Coffman</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Galanaud</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Peuchmaur</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Emilie</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>J Immunol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>170</volume><fpage>3392</fpage><lpage>3400</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12626600</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B114"><title><p>The natural history of the renal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pollak</snm><fnm>VE</fnm></au><au><snm>Pirani</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au><au><snm>Schwartz</snm><fnm>FD</fnm></au></aug><source>J Lab Clin Med</source><pubdate>1964</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>537</fpage><lpage>550</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">14155443</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B115"><title><p>Improved clinical outcome of lupus nephritis during the past decade: importance of early diagnosis and treatment</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fiehn</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Hajjar</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Mueller</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>62</volume><fpage>435</fpage><lpage>439</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.62.5.435</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1754523</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12695156</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B116"><title><p>Highrisk features of lupus nephritis: importance of race and clinical and histological factors in 166 patients</p></title><aug><au><snm>Austin</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Boumpas</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au><au><snm>Vaughan</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au><au><snm>Balow</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>Nephrol Dial Transplant</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>1620</fpage><lpage>1628</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8559480</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B117"><title><p>Lupus nephritis: prognostic factors and probability of maintaining lifesupporting renal function 10 years after the diagnosis. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Nefrite Lupica (GISNEL)</p></title><source>Am J Kidney Dis</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>473</fpage><lpage>479</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">1585937</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B118"><title><p>Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trail of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Austin</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kilppel</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Balow</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>N Engl J Med</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>614</fpage><lpage>619</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B119"><title><p>Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized controlled trial</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gourley</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Austin</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Scott</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Yarboro</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Vaughan</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au><au><snm>Muir</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Boumpas</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au><au><snm>Klippel</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Balow</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Steinberg</snm><fnm>AD</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Int Med</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>125</volume><fpage>549</fpage><lpage>557</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">8815753</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B120"><title><p>The very long-term prognosis and complications of lupus nephritis and its treatment</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bono</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Cameron</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Hicks</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au></aug><source>QJM</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>92</volume><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/qjmed/92.4.211</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10396609</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B121"><title><p>Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide</p></title><aug><au><snm>Houssiau</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>Vasconcelos</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>D'Cruz</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Sebastiani</snm><fnm>GD</fnm></au><au><snm>de Ramon Garrido</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Danieli</snm><fnm>MG</fnm></au><au><snm>Abramovicz</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Blockmans</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Mathieu</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Direskeneli</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Galeazzi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gul</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Levy</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Petera</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Popovic</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Petrovic</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Sinico</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Cattaneo</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Font</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Depresseux</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Cosyns</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Cervera</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>2121</fpage><lpage>2131</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.10461</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12209517</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B122"><title><p>Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action</p></title><aug><au><snm>Allison</snm><fnm>AC</fnm></au><au><snm>Eugui</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunopharmacology</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>47</volume><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00188-0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10878285</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B123"><title><p>Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>TM</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>FK</fnm></au><au><snm>Tang</snm><fnm>CSO</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>RWS</fnm></au><au><snm>Fang</snm><fnm>GX</fnm></au><au><snm>Lau</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>AKM</fnm></au><au><snm>Tong</snm><fnm>MKL</fnm></au><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>KW</fnm></au><au><snm>Lai</snm><fnm>KN</fnm></au></aug><source>N Engl J Med</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>343</volume><fpage>1156</fpage><lpage>1162</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1056/NEJM200010193431604</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11036121</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B124"><title><p>Mycophenolate mofetil or IV cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ginzler</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au><au><snm>Dooley</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Aranow</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>N Engl J Med</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>353</volume><fpage>2219</fpage><lpage>2228</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa043731</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16306519</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B125"><title><p>Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Appel</snm><fnm>GB</fnm></au><au><snm>Contreras</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Dooley</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>1103</fpage><lpage>1116</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1681/ASN.2008101028</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2678035</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19369404</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B126"><title><p>Role of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Contreras</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Sosnov</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>879</fpage><lpage>890</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2215/CJN.02740707</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17702717</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B127"><title><p>Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial</p></title><aug><au><snm>Houssiau</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>D' Cruz</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Sangle</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Remy</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Vasconcelos</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Petrovic</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Fiehn</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Garrido</snm><fnm>ER</fnm></au><au><snm>Gilboe</snm><fnm>I-M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tektonidou</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Blockmans</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Ravelingien</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Guern</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Depresseux</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Guillevin</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ricard Cervera</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><cnm>the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial Group</cnm></au></aug><source>Ann Rheum Dis</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>69</volume><fpage>2083</fpage><lpage>2089</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/ard.2010.131995</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3002764</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20833738</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B128"><title><p>Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Roman</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Shanker</snm><fnm>BA</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>N Engl J Med</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>349</volume><fpage>2399</fpage><lpage>2406</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa035471</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14681505</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B129"><title><p>Risk factors for coronary heart disease in women with systemic lupus erythematosis: the Toronto Risk Factor Study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bruce</snm><fnm>IN</fnm></au><au><snm>Urowitz</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au><au><snm>Gladman</snm><fnm>DD</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>3159</fpage><lpage>3167</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.11296</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14613278</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B130"><title><p>Trabecular and cortical bone loss in systemic lupus erythematosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Houssiau</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lefevre</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Depresseaux</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Lambert</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Devogelaer</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Nagant de Deuxchaisnes</snm><fnm/></au></aug><source>Br J Rheum</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>247</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/rheumatology/35.3.244</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B131"><title><p>Immunospecific reduction of antioligonucleotide antibody-forming cells with a tetrakisoligonucleotide conjugate (LJP 394), a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Barstad</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Field</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hachmann</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayag</snm><fnm>MS</fnm></au><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>KW</fnm></au><au><snm>Iverson</snm><fnm>GM</fnm></au><au><snm>Livingston</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Palanki</snm><fnm>MS</fnm></au></aug><source>J Med Chem</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>38</volume><fpage>2138</fpage><lpage>2144</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jm00012a013</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7783145</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B132"><title><p>LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosis: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alarcon-Segovia</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Tumlin</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Furie</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>442</fpage><lpage>454</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.10763</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12571854</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B133"><title><p>Remission of proliferative lupus nephritis following B call depletion therapy is preceded by down-regulation of the T cell costimulatory molecule CD40 ligand: an open-label trial</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sfikakis</snm><fnm>PP</fnm></au><au><snm>Boletis</snm><fnm>JN</fnm></au><au><snm>Lionaki</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>501</fpage><lpage>513</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.20858</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15693003</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B134"><title><p>Initial clinical trial of epratuzumab (humanized anti-CD22 antibody) for immunotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>D&#246;rner</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaufmann</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Wegener</snm><fnm>WA</fnm></au><au><snm>Teoh</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldenberg</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Burmester</snm><fnm>GR</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Res Ther</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>R74</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/ar1942</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1526638</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16630358</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B135"><title><p>A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, doseranging study of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wallace</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Stohl</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Furie</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lisse</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Mckay</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Merrill</snm><fnm>JT</fnm></au><au><snm>Petri</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ginzler</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au><au><snm>Chatham</snm><fnm>WW</fnm></au><au><snm>Mccune</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Fernandez</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Chevrier</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhong</snm><fnm>ZJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Freimuth</snm><fnm>WW</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>61</volume><fpage>1168</fpage><lpage>1178</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.24699</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2758229</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19714604</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B136"><title><p>Predicting renal outcomes in severe lupus nephritis: contributions of clinical and histologic data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Austin HA</snm><fnm>III</fnm></au><au><snm>Boumpas</snm><fnm>DT</fnm></au><au><snm>Vaughan</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au></aug><source>Kidney Int</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>544</fpage><lpage>550</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ki.1994.70</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8164443</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B137"><title><p>Prognosis in proliferative status and race/ethnicity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Barr</snm><fnm>RG</fnm></au><au><snm>Seliger</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Appel</snm><fnm>GB</fnm></au></aug><source>Nephrol Dial Transplant</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>2039</fpage><lpage>2046</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/ndt/gfg345</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">13679478</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B138"><title><p>Longterm outcome of diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis treated with cyclophosphamide</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mok</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Ying</snm><fnm>KY</fnm></au><au><snm>Ng</snm><fnm>WL</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>KW</fnm></au><au><snm>To</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Lau</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>RWS</fnm></au><au><snm>Au</snm><fnm>TK</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Med</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>119</volume><fpage>355e25</fpage><lpage>355e33</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B139"><title><p>Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and systemic lupus erythematosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zandman-Goddard</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Levy</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Shoenfeld</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Rev Allergy Immunol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>228</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1385/CRIAI:29:3:219</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16391397</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B140"><title><p>Intravenous immunoglobulin compared with clyclophosphamide for proliferative lupus nephritis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boletis</snm><fnm>JN</fnm></au><au><snm>Loannidis</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Boki</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Moutsopoulos</snm><fnm>HM</fnm></au></aug><source>Lancet</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>354</volume><fpage>569</fpage><lpage>570</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01575-5</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10470708</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B141"><title><p>Longterm treatment of lupus nephritis with cyclosporin A</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tam</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Leung</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>KC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lai</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Szeto</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lui</snm><fnm>SF</fnm></au></aug><source>QJM</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>91</volume><fpage>573</fpage><lpage>580</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/qjmed/91.8.573</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9893761</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B142"><title><p>Effect of 1 year of cyclosporine A treatment on the activity and renal involvement of systemic lupus 		erythematosis: a pilot study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Dostal</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Tesar</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Rychlik</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Zabka</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Vencovsky</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Bartunkova</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stejskalova</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Tegzova</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Lupus</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9493146</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B143"><title><p>Autologous stem cell transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jayne</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Passweg</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Marmont</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Lupus</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>168</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1191/0961203304lu525oa</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15119545</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>