Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Arthritis Research & Therapy and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Advances in systemic sclerosis and related fibrotic and vascular conditions

Review

How does endothelial cell injury start? The role of endothelin in systemic sclerosis

David Abraham1* and Oliver Distler2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, Royal Free Hospital and University College, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK

2 Center of Experimental Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zürich, Gloriastrasse, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland

For all author emails, please log on.

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2007, 9(Suppl 2):S2  doi:10.1186/ar2186


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://arthritis-research.com/content/9/S2/S2


Published:15 August 2007

© 2007 BioMed Central Ltd

Abstract

A considerable amount of research time has been invested in studies aimed at elucidating pathogenic processes in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Despite this, major challenges for biomedical science remain, such as identification of the key factors that determine susceptibility to SSc, and elucidation of the precise nature of the initiating event that causes endothelial cell injury and ultimately brings about the biological cascade(s) that lead to the pathologic vascular changes. Involved factors are likely to include genetic perturbations, environmental cues, tissue injury, infection and hypoxia/oxidative stress. As important as determining the initiating events are the identification and characterization of key factors that are functionally important in driving vascular disease progression, because these factors are potential targets for therapeutic intervention. This article reviews the role of endothelin as an example of a pleiotropic mediator with effects on various aspects of SSc pathogenesis, such as inflammation, vasculopathy and tissue remodelling.

Introduction

In order to understand the initiators of endothelial injury and how the ensuing vascular dysfunction contributes to the development of systemic sclerosis (SSc), it is necessary to consider the normal biology of the endothelium and of the myriad of biological molecules and biological functions under its control, and to assess which specific processes are dysregulated in disease. In SSc, the vasculopathy is one of the earliest pathological events, characterized by endothelial cell activation and altered vascular tone. These pathological changes are accompanied by the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic regulatory factors, and the loss of redox control, leading to oxidative stress and hypoxia. This complex array of molecular interactions involves a number of cell types including the endothelial cells and their attendant perivascular supporting cells (pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells [vSMCs]), and inflammatory cells, and they are profoundly influenced by the presence of growth factors, cytokines, chemokines and potent vasoactive factors. Together, this diverse range of factors is believed to initiate and drive the vascular pathogenesis that leads to severe vessel disease and occlusion. Here we focus on one particularly attractive candidate, endothelin, and critically examine the cellular and molecular activities mediated by endothelin and its receptors that are intimately associated with endothelial cell injury and vascular dysfunction in SSc.

The endothelium

The vascular endothelium is a complex, highly specialized and metabolically active organ, which performs a number of essential biological functions. The endothelium provides a compatible interface to facilitate blood circulation, it inherently inhibits excessive platelet aggregation and leucocyte adhesion, and it produces a balance of vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory molecules that coordinate vascular tone and serve to inhibit extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation. The endothelium also serves as a multifunctional interface between blood and all internal organs, selectively determining the movement of macromolecules and governing the recruitment of circulating cells from the blood into the extravascular tissues. The prominent endocrine functions of the endothelium work to regulate vascular tone, through the production of vasoconstrictive (for instance, endothelin [ET]-1) and vasodilatory (for example, nitric oxide and prostaglandins) molecules; to maintain blood fluidity; to regulate platelet function; and to control inflammation. Healthy functioning of the endothelium is critical for remodelling of blood vessels, through angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, during times of tissue growth and repair. Thus, the endothelial cell phenotype must be regulated, and this is achieved by environmental cues and mechanical forces such as shear stress, as well as inflammatory and angiogenic stimuli [1].

Triggers of endothelial cell injury and dysfunction

Endothelial dysfunction is an important component of a number of common human diseases, including those characterized by inflammation and fibrosis (Figure 1). Our particular interest is in the contribution of endothelial dysfunction to the pathophysiology of inflammatory and fibrotic connective tissue diseases and, in particular, SSc. Endothelial dysfunction is likely to result from endothelial cell injury triggered via a number of different mechanisms, including the following [2]: bacterial or viral infection; oxidative stress through abnormal regulation of reactive oxygen species, hypoxia, turbulent blood flow and shear stress; environmental irritants such as tobacco; and hyperlipidaemia. These factors all lead to the generation of an inflammatory process and endothelial cell activation.

thumbnailFigure 1. The myriad of potential consequences of endothelial dysfunction. Many human diseases, and in particular some of the most common diseases, are characterized by abnormal changes that take place within the blood vessel and alter vascular responses and function. vSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells.

The endothelial response to injury can be divided into two 'levels' of response: an initial rapid response and a slower, phenotypic response. The initial rapid response involves (among other factors) changes in levels of nitric oxide, prostaglandins, ET-1, von Willebrand factor and tissue plasminogen activator. The slower response depends on fundamental changes in cell surface characteristics, and alterations in the underlying basement membrane and the smooth muscle cells that surround the endothelium. These changes are brought about by molecules that are particularly potent growth factors involved in the deposition of ECM, and activation and proliferation of the vSMCs, pericytes and other mesenchymal cell types associated with the blood vessel wall. This ultimately results in vessel remodelling, with profound changes in cellular architecture [3].

Pericytes are associated with microvessels and capillaries (about 30 μm diameter) and smooth muscle cells are associated with intermediate (> 50 μm) and large (1 to 5 mm) vessels and muscular arteries [4]. In terms of endothelial cells and blood vessels, one must consider these as functional units, which also involve both pericytes and vSMCs. In SSc there are a number of important endothelium-derived mediators that have been shown to be important in the early disease process. It is important to determine which of these link vascular damage to the ensuing fibrogenic or pathogenic tissue remodelling process and the characteristic signs and symptoms of SSc.

Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis

Over the past two decades considerable research effort has been directed toward investigating and elucidating the pathogenic processes of connective tissue diseases such as SSc. Factors that determine susceptibility to these diseases, and the precise nature of the initiating event, remain largely unknown. However, they are likely to involve host genetics, the impact of environmental cues, tissue injury, infection, hypoxia and inability to control oxidative stress adequately [5] (Figure 2).

thumbnailFigure 2. Sequence of pathological events leading to the development of SSc. ECM, extracellular matrix; IL, interleukin; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; SMC, smooth muscle cell; SSc, systemic sclerosis; TGF, transforming growth factor.

Patients with SSc often exhibit early signs of vasculopathy, with many experiencing Raynaud's phenomenon, often for many years before developing overt signs of skin fibrosis. Consistent with this, morphological changes in capillaries are detectable before or at disease onset, which can be used for early diagnosis using nail-fold capillaroscopy. Changes in the blood vessels of the SSc patient are frequently associated with stimulation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses, resulting in B-cell and T-cell activation and, in many cases, autoantibody production. Inflammation is believed to be a primary driver that leads to tissue remodelling and gives rise to the characteristic features of excess matrix production, caused by an imbalance in turnover and increased deposition of various extracellular proteins [6]. The impact of this inflammation probably depends on the organs involved, with evidence for a stronger association of inflammation and fibrosis, for example, in the lungs, whereas significant inflammatory infiltrates in the skin are limited to perivascular areas in early-stage disease [7]. However, the expression of profibrotic mediators is not limited to inflammatory cells in the skin, and resident cells, such as dermal fibroblasts, express increased levels of these mediators in later stage disease [8].

These changes result in a sequence of pathological events that includes impaired cell-cell communication between epithelial cells and fibroblasts, and development of fibrotic lesions that disrupt the normal tissue architecture and lead to impaired expression of the correct molecular cues and cellular mediators that maintain normal tissue structure and function. Ultimately, these abnormalities lead to vascular and interstitial fibrogenic processes. This so-called 'replacement fibrosis' replaces normal tissue architecture and often leads to organ compromise and failure [9].

Because early disease is initiated in the vasculature, and many of the manifestations of SSc are vascular in nature (capillary abnormalities, vessel occlusion and fibrosis, and digital ulceration), identification of the components of the pathway from the initial vascular insult to the downstream fibrotic phenotype is critical. However, characterization of the early vascular events is challenging in SSc, because patients are usually available only in later stages of disease when the disease is already established and because animal models only incompletely reflect the human condition [10,11]. Regardless of the precise mechanisms that underlie the initial vascular injury, it might be even more important to identify and characterize the array of mediators driving the vascular remodelling that leads to the vascular features typical of SSc. Those mediators that are over-produced (beyond normal levels of production) by endothelial cells of SSc patients include growth factors, cytokines, and other mediators of hyperplasia and hypertrophy. These include ET-1, connective tissue growth factor and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and matrix-modulating proteins such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and natural tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) [3,12]. They are also important regulators of the activation and function of inflammatory mediators, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukins and some chemokines. These mediators in turn have a significant impact on the progression of connective tissue diseases.

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies and oxidative stress

Another important pathological feature of SSc, and one which is probably highly relevant to the vasculopathy, is the presence of specific anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies (AECAs) [13,14]. These antibodies are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that specifically recognize endothelial cell proteins and molecules present on the endothelial cell surface. Studies of AECAs have shown that these antibodies can also activate endothelial cells to express cell adhesion molecules, thereby altering leucocyte attachment, and can also lead to endothelial cell damage and apoptosis. Several studies have also suggested that AECAs may play a prominent role in disease progression. A recent study [15] yielded the exciting finding that all SSc sera examined expressed autoantibodies directed against platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors. These autoantibodies were found to stimulate PDGF receptor signalling, which led to the generation of reactive oxygen species. This increase in oxidative stress (a hallmark feature of SSc) strongly suggests a pathogenic role for these autoantibodies in disease, and that they are involved in autocrine and paracrine activities, and the cascade of events that leads to enhanced ECM synthesis.

Thus, the identification of functional key players in the processes that link vascular dysfunction to fibrogenesis will assist in defining potential molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Along this line, processes that impact on both the vascular and fibrotic pathogenic processes are of particular interest. Although several molecular mediators are involved in these processes, one of the key contributors is ET-1. This article focuses on the biological function(s) of this molecule, and the pivotal cell and molecular mechanism(s) regulated by ET-1 in health and pathological activities in connective tissue diseases.

The endothelin axis: role in the control of vascular tone

The endothelins are a family of three vasoactive peptides (ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3). The three 21-amino-acid endothelin isoforms bind to two endothelin receptors (endothelin receptor subtype A [ETA] and ETB), with equal affinities for ETB but with a hierarchy of affinities for the ETA receptor. ET-1 has the highest affinity for ETA, followed by ET-2 and ET-3 [16]. The roles of the ETA and ETB receptors are becoming less clearly distinguished as the literature expands. Indeed, both have been implicated as mediators of the deleterious effects of ET-1. The receptors exhibit a wide tissue distribution and are expressed in kidney, liver, lung and skin; they are known to be abnormally expressed in various diseases characterized by defective vascular control. Abnormalities observed in the endothelin system have been associated with vasoconstriction, vasospasm and vascular hypertrophy.

Endothelin-1 and receptor interaction

ET-1 is the major and most studied endothelin isoform. ET-1 is produced by endothelial and mesenchymal cell types, such as fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, and acts in a paracrine and autocrine manner. ET-1 production is controlled by a number of soluble factors, including TGF-β, which is a well recognized major profibrotic factor, and it plays a major role in constriction and proliferation.

The ETA and ETB receptors have seven transmembrane domains and are coupled to G proteins. ETA is expressed in mesenchymal cells and ETB is expressed on endothelial cells. ET-1 is produced as a pre-pro transcript that is translated into a pre-pro polypeptide of 212 amino acids. The pre-pro polypeptide is then processed by a series of converting enzymes to proET-1 (or 'big ET-1'), which is a large, relatively inactive endothelin molecule that exhibits approximately 1% of the activity of the fully functional 21-amino-acid peptide. Big ET-1 is then converted by the membrane-bound enzyme endothelin converting enzyme-1 into its functional, 21-amino-acid form (Figure 3) [17-20]. It is then released as an active form and binds to the specific endothelin receptors that are expressed on a number of different cell types. ET-1 activity can be inhibited with a number of classes of inhibitors that act at different points along the endothelin cascade. Inhibitors are available that selectively block endothelin converting enzyme-1 to prevent production of the active peptide from big ET-1; single or dual endothelin receptor antagonists block the effects of ET-1 on target cells; cascade inhibitors disrupt the intracellular signalling processes that are induced by ETA/ETB binding; and inhibitors of transcription prevent transcriptional activation and the downstream production of proteins that are elevated by ET-1 and associated with the SSc phenotype. Many of these inhibitors have been shown to interrupt the effects of ET-1 effectively and have been the subject of a plethora of basic science studies.

thumbnailFigure 3. Overview of ET-1 biosynthesis and function. Endothelial cell stimulation promotes the synthesis of pre-pro endothelin (ET)-1 polypeptides, the activation of processes that result in production of ET-1, and local release of mature ET-1. ET-1 interacts with specific endothelin receptors (endothelin receptor subtype A [ETA] and ETB) expressed on the surface of vascular smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts, and with ETB receptors in endothelial cells. Recognition of ET-1 by these receptors activates intracellular signalling pathways and cascades that result in rapid alterations in cell activity and function, and initiates transcriptional programmes. Several points along the pathways of production, release, receptor ligation and signalling, as well as transcriptional activation, are potential targets for intervention. aa, amino acids; ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist; IL, interleukin; siRNA, small interfering RNA; SMC, smooth muscle cell; TGF, transforming growth factor.

The widespread distribution of endothelin receptors on many cell types suggests that they have important and wideranging biological activities in vivo. In the context of our understanding of the processes involved in SSc and other connective tissue diseases, the primary 'target' cells for the activity of ET-1 include smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts (and their differentiation to myofibroblasts, which is the characteristic cell type of SSc and other connective tissue diseases) and macrophages, in which activation by ET-1 elicits a number of cell-type specific responses. In smooth muscle cells ET-1 promotes vasoconstriction and results in proliferation and elevated production of the key profibrotic factors TGF-β and PDGF. In fibroblasts ET-1 increases ECM production and increases adhesion molecule expression, thereby facilitating leucocyte-fibroblast interactions. This is also observed in endothelial cells [21]. ETB receptors are expressed by macrophages, and in these cells ET-1 modulates inflammatory responses such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation, release of free radicals, and increased levels of interleukin-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [22] and TGF-β.

Multiple actions of endothelin

The important actions of ET-1 from the perspective of connective tissue remodelling include induction of proliferation, chemotaxis of macrophages and smooth muscle cells, activation of smooth muscle cells, and differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblast phenotypes.

As introduced above, the biological activity of ET-1 with respect to specific cell types can broadly be divided into two types of functional response. The 'early responses' involve cell signalling and calcium metabolism, are rapid and transient, and are important with respect to cell contraction. The slower, so-called 'phenotypic responses' culminate in the characteristic remodelling phenotype of SSc. These latter responses, which occur within hours and days rather than minutes, involve transcriptional activation and stimulation of modifying genes that control matrix (such as those encoding MMPs and TIMPs), that potentiate the contractile machinery (such as the actin and paxillin genes) and that alter tissue architecture (for instance, genes encoding ECM proteins, including collagen; Figure 4).

thumbnailFigure 4. Dual action of ET-1 on mesenchymal cell types. Shown are key activities of endothelin (ET)-1 on endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs) and fibroblasts. Rapid endothelin-mediated responses include the modulation of calcium concentration and influx, levels of nitric oxide (NO) and cGMP, and the associated contractile response in order to regulate vascular tone. Slower more adaptive responses include the activation of transcriptional programmes to effect mesenchymal cell transition and differentiation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) production resulting in tissue remodelling. DAG, diacylglycerol; ETA/BR, endothelin receptor subtype A/B receptor; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PIP, phosphatidylinositol phosphate; PKB, protein kinase B; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase C.

Endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis

Elevated levels of endothelin-1 are present in patients with systemic sclerosis

There is now a wealth of evidence that ET-1 is expressed in both early-stage and late-stage SSc. The protein has been shown to be over-expressed in biological fluids and tissue sections in patients with SSc, and increased expression of ET-1 and increased receptor binding sites are found in presclerotic and early diffuse skin lesions [23]. Elevated levels of ET-1 have been observed in multiple organs that are affected by SSc, notably blood vessels, lung, kidney and skin [24].

Endothelin-1 is implicated in the pathological sequence of events that is characteristic of systemic sclerosis

Within the context of tissue remodelling and fibrosis in SSc, it is the vSMCs, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts that are the cells of particular interest. Laboratory experiments have focused on evaluating the characteristics of these cell types and extrapolating the findings to what may occur in vivo, and on determining how this information can be used effectively in the clinical setting. Thus, we are interested in examining cell contractility and migration, cell migration, inflammation, and matrix deposition and remodelling.

ET-1 activates the surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 on fibroblasts, and collagen production by both dermal and pulmonary fibroblasts. It can also stimulate fibroblasts to exhibit potent procontractile properties and promote the formation of highly contractive myofibroblasts [25,26]. In SSc it is important to note that the MMP/TIMP cascade is dysregulated, with an increase in many MMPs. Particularly intriguing is the elevation in MMP-2 (gelatinase A), which is capable of processing endothelin precursors to active endothelin, thereby potentially exacerbating the disease process. Classical and MMP-activated endothelin can induce gene transcription and result in the familiar cellular changes of fibrosis, matrix deposition and tissue remodelling that are observed in SSc.

As well as matrix production and remodelling, SSc is characterized by an early inflammatory response that involves increased leucocyte infiltration to affected tissues and elevated leucocyte-fibroblast interactions. Examining biopsies from patients with early disease, Koch and coworkers [27] found a number of cell adhesion molecules known to mediate leucocyte interactions to be over-expressed. The nature of these interactions has been addressed in a number of studies, and the importance of the leucocyte function-associated antigen-1/ICAM-1 pathway in T-cell/fibroblast interaction has been noted [28]. In the laboratory, T cells attach and bind more readily to SSc fibroblasts than to control fibroblasts [29], and by using antibody blockade it is possible to inhibit specifically the binding of these T cells to SSc fibroblasts in vitro. Interestingly, ICAM-1 expression on both normal and SSc fibroblasts is activated by ET-1. By adding ET-1 and an antagonist, this increased attachment could be inhibited. ET-1 therefore appears to increase ICAM-1, which increases T-cell interaction with fibroblasts. It might thus be an important factor in leucocyte recruitment into extravascular tissues in the early inflammatory stages of SSc.

Further evidence for the role of ICAM-1 was recently reported [30]. This study detailed the intracellular signalling pathways that lead to the increased expression of ICAM-1 elicited by ET-1 by using inhibitors of signalling pathways, transfections with ICAM-1 promoter-reporter constructs, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The authors demonstrated that the regulation of fibroblast ICAM-1 expression by ET-1 was mediated by NF-κB. It was apparent that NF-κB is activated by ET-1, which activates the ICAM-1 gene in a manner similar to that with interleukin-1. ET-1 therefore can also play a proinflammatory role, and is able to turn on ICAM-1 gene expression and cause an increase in leucocyte-fibroblast interaction. This upregulation of fibroblast ICAM-1 was found to be potently inhibited by the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan and specific inhibitors of ET-1-dependent signalling pathways [31].

Impact of endothelin receptor antagonists on the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis

Evidence for the involvement of ET-1 in the pathophysiology of SSc also comes from receptor blockade studies. For example, ET-1 has been shown to induce an expression pattern in cultured lung fibroblasts similar to that in SSc fibroblasts, and bosentan was shown to attenuate this response and partially 'normalize' the scleroderma phenotype [26]. These studies have been extended using Affymetrix gene expression profiling of control fibroblasts and those from SSc patients. These studies have shown that bosentan reduces the differences observed between the gene expression patterns in SSc and control lung fibroblasts. The findings of experiments like these demonstrate that approximately one-third of genes that define the SSc signature are modulated toward a more normal profile in the presence of bosentan. However, it must be emphasized that the clinical setting is extremely complex, and it is therefore difficult to unravel fully the pathophysiological scenarios in the laboratory using cell culture studies and animal models. There is clearly significant crosstalk between different cell types in the disease process as well as between different factors. The temporal interaction(s) and links between these biological processes are also important, as are the levels and expression patterns of the critical mediators and responding cell types. Data obtained thus far in the context of SSc support the notion that ET-1 can play an important role in a number of relevant pathological processes, including inflammation, vasculopathy, tissue remodelling and fibrosis. This places ET-1 as a key mediator in this disease.

Returning to the initial question of how endothelial cell injury starts, the answer is that this remains elusive. There are some excellent data from the UCD200 chicken scleroderma model that suggest that endothelial cell apoptosis, promoted by AECAs, is a key early event in endothelial injury [32], but the human correlates have not been as convincing. However, is it absolutely necessary to know the exact nature of the initiating event(s), or is it equally important to understand the factors that subsequently drive the disease process? One example that supports the latter is the role played by TNF-α in rheumatoid arthritis. Although the role, if any, that TNF-α plays in the initiating events of rheumatoid arthritis is unclear, it is very important in driving inflammation and subsequent disease progression. This in turn defines TNF-α as an optimal target for therapeutic intervention in rheumatoid arthritis.

Indeed, TNF-α inhibitors are now successfully used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Likewise, blocking critical mediators such as ET-1, TGF-β and certain chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 may likewise be effective in preventing the progression of fibrotic diseases such as SSc.

Conclusion

Significant evidence suggests that ET-1 is important in a number of aspects of fibrotic diseases such as SSc. In inflammation, through induction of ICAM-1, ET-1 activates adhesion molecule expression, which may be important in regulating the inflammatory response that occurs in the early stages of SSc. It is well accepted that endothelin plays a major role in vasoconstriction, and it is an important mediator in ECM remodelling and deposition. ET-1 can activate fibroblasts and other mesenchymal cells along the differentiation pathway toward the myofibroblast, which is the principal culprit in tissue remodelling, repair and ultimately fibrosis. ET-1 activates adhesion molecule expression, which may be important in regulating the inflammatory response. ET-1 receptor antagonists, such as bosentan, have been shown to block early and late-stage manifestations of disease and may thus help to prevent the progression of fibrotic diseases such as SSc.

Abbreviations

AECA = anti-endothelial cell autoantibody; ECM = extracellular matrix; ET = endothelin; ETA/ETB = endothelin receptor subtype A/B; ICAM = intercellular adhesion molecule; MMP = matrix metalloproteinase; NF-κB = nuclear factor-κB; PDGF = platelet-derived growth factor; SSc = systemic sclerosis; TGF = transforming growth factor; TIMP = tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TNF = tumour necrosis factor; vSMC = vascular smooth muscle cell.

Competing interests

The authors have received speaker fees and reimbursement for travel expenses from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge medical writing support funded by an educational grant from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

This article is part of Arthritis Research & Therapy Volume 9 Supplement 2: Advances in systemic sclerosis and related fibrotic and vascular conditions, and is based on presentations made at a symposium entitled Advances in systemic sclerosis and connective tissue disease, sponsored by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, held in Athens, Greece in April 2006. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://arthritis-research.com/supplements/9/S2. This supplement has been supported by an educational grant from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

References

  1. Koch AE, Distler O: Vasculopathy and disordered angiogenesis in selected rheumatic diseases: rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis.

    Arthritis Res Ther 2007, 9(Suppl 2):S3. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Ross R: Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease.

    N Engl J Med 1999, 340:115-126. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Newby AC: Matrix metalloproteinases regulate migration, proliferation, and death of vascular smooth muscle cells by degrading matrix and non-matrix substrates.

    Cardiovasc Res 2006, 69:614-624. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Bou-Gharios G, Ponticos M, Rajkumar V, Abraham D: Extra-cellular matrix in vascular networks.

    Cell Prolif 2004, 37:207-220. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Denton CP, Black CM, Abraham DJ: Mechanisms and consequences of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis.

    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2006, 2:134-144. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Abraham DJ, Varga J: Scleroderma: from cell and molecular mechanisms to disease models.

    Trends Immunol 2005, 26:587-595. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Jimenez SA, Derk CT: Following the molecular pathways toward an understanding of the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis.

    Ann Intern Med 2004, 140:37-50. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Chizzolini C, Parel Y, Scheja A, Dayer JM: Polarized subsets of human T-helper cells induce distinct patterns of chemokine production by normal and systemic sclerosis dermal fibroblasts.

    Arthritis Res Ther 2005, 8:R10. BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  9. Ihn H: Scleroderma, fibroblasts, signaling, and excessive extracellular matrix.

    Curr Rheumatol Rep 2005, 7:156-162. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Nguyen VA, Sgonc R, Dietrich H, Wick G: Endothelial injury in internal organs of University of California at Davis line 200 (UCD 200) chickens, an animal model for systemic sclerosis (scleroderma).

    J Autoimmun 2000, 14:143-149. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Yamamoto T: The bleomycin-induced scleroderma model: what have we learned for scleroderma pathogenesis?

    Arch Dermatol Res 2006, 297:333-344. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G: Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs.

    Cardiovasc Res 2006, 69:562-573. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Carvalho D, Savage CO, Black CM, Pearson JD: IgG antiendothelial cell autoantibodies from scleroderma patients induce leukocyte adhesion to human vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Induction of adhesion molecule expression and involvement of endothelium-derived cytokines.

    J Clin Invest 1996, 97:111-119. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Ahmed SS, Tan FK, Arnett FC, Jin L, Geng YJ: Induction of apoptosis and fibrillin 1 expression in human dermal endothelial cells by scleroderma sera containing anti-endothelial cell antibodies.

    Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54:2250-2262. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Baroni SS, Santillo M, Bevilacqua F, Luchetti M, Spadoni T, Mancini M, Fraticelli P, Sambo P, Funaro A, Kazlauskas A, et al.: Stimulatory autoantibodies to the PDGF receptor in systemic sclerosis.

    N Engl J Med 2006, 354:2667-2676. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA: Endothelins: molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology.

    Pharmacol Rev 1994, 46:325-415. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Galiè N, Manes A, Branzi A: The endothelin system in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Cardiovasc Res 2004, 61:227-237. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. La M, Reid JJ: Endothelin-1 and the regulation of vascular tone.

    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1995, 22:315-323. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Fagan KA, McMurtry IF, Rodman DM: Role of endothelin-1 in lung disease.

    Respir Res 2001, 2:90-101. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  20. Shimada K, Matsushita Y, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi M, Matsubara A, Iijima Y, Tanzawa K: Cloning and functional expression of human endothelin-converting enzyme cDNA.

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995, 207:807-812. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Fernandez-Patron C, Zouki C, Whittal R, Chan JS, Davidge ST, Filep JG: Matrix metalloproteinases regulate neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion through generation of endothelin-1[1–32].

    FASEB J 2001, 15:2230-2240. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Wilson SH, Simari RD, Lerman A: The effect of endothelin-1 on nuclear factor kappa B in macrophages.

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001, 286:968-972. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Vancheeswaran R, Magoulas T, Efrat G, Wheeler-Jones C, Olsen I, Penny R, Black CM: Circulating endothelin-1 levels in systemic sclerosis subsets: a marker of fibrosis or vascular dysfunction?

    J Rheumatol 1994, 21:1838-1844. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  24. Abraham DJ, Vancheeswaran R, Dashwood MR, Rajkumar VS, Pantelides P, Xu SW, du Bois RM, Black CM: Increased levels of endothelin-1 and differential endothelin type A and B receptor expression in scleroderma-associated fibrotic lung disease.

    Am J Pathol 1997, 151:831-841. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  25. Shi-Wen X, Denton CP, Dashwood MR, Holmes AM, Bou-Gharios G, Pearson JD, Black CM, Abraham DJ: Fibroblast matrix gene expression and connective tissue remodeling: role of endothelin-1.

    J Invest Dermatol 2001, 116:417-425. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Shi-Wen X, Chen Y, Denton CP, Eastwood M, Renzoni EA, Bou-Gharios G, Pearson JD, Dashwood M, du Bois RM, Black CM, et al.: Endothelin-1 promotes myofibroblast induction through the ETA receptor via a rac/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway and is essential for the enhanced contractile phenotype of fibrotic fibroblasts.

    Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15:2707-2719. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  27. Koch AE, Kronfeld-Harrington LB, Szekanecz Z, Cho MM, Haines GK, Harlow LA, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL, Massa MC, Barr WG, et al.: In situ expression of cytokines and cellular adhesion molecules in the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis. Their role in early and late disease.

    Pathobiology 1993, 61:239-246. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  28. Sakkas LI, Chikanza IC, Platsoucas CD: Mechanisms of disease: the role of immune cells in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis.

    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2006, 2:679-685. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Abraham C, Griffith J, Miller J: The dependence for leukocyte function-associated antigen-1/ICAM-1 interactions in T cell activation cannot be overcome by expression of high density TCR ligand.

    J Immunol 1999, 162:4399-4405. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Waters CE, Shi-Wen X, Denton CP, Abraham DJ, Pearson JD: Signaling pathways regulating intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression by endothelin 1: comparison with interleukin-1beta in normal and scleroderma dermal fibroblasts.

    Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54:649-660. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Xu SW, Denton CP, Dashwood MR, Abraham DJ, Black CM: Endothelin-1 regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in normal and sclerodermal fibroblasts.

    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1998, (Suppl 1):S545-S547. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  32. Sgonc R, Gruschwitz MS, Dietrich H, Recheis H, Gershwin ME, Wick G: Endothelial cell apoptosis is a primary pathogenetic event underlying skin lesions in avian and human scleroderma.

    J Clin Invest 1996, 98:785-792. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL