Table 1

Confirmed linkage effects in systemic lupus erythematosus

Linkage region
LOD score
Study center
Study design
Associated gene(s)
Mouse ortholog
Cohort ethnicity
Ref(s)

1q23
4.0
OMRF
Extended pedigrees
FCGR2A, FCGR3A
sle1, nba2 [54]
EA, AA
[6,7]
1q31-32
3.8
UU
Extended pedigrees

sle1c [84]
EU
[6,85]
1q41-43
3.3
UCLA
USC
Extended pedigrees
PARP*

EA, HIS
[7,86]
2q37
4.2
UU
Extended pedigrees
PDCD-1

EU
[13,87]
4p16
3.8
OMRF
Extended pedigrees

sle6 [88]
EA
[89,90]
6p11-21
4.2
UMN
Sib-pairs
HLA-DR
sles1 [88,91]
EA, HIS, AA
[16]
10q22-23
P = 0.0002
OMRF
UCLA
Extended pedigrees, sib-pairs


AA
[92-94]
12q24
3.3
OMRF
Extended pedigrees


HIS, EA
[95]
16q12-13
3.4
UMN
OMRF
Sib-pairs, extended pedigrees


EA, AA, HIS
[96,97]

*Although there was initial evidence that PARP was the gene responsible for this linkage [17], subsequent studies have failed to confirm an association [18-21]. The initial linkage at 10q22 was described using allele sharing statistics; therefore, a P value is generated instead of a log of odds (LOD) score. AA, African-Americanl EA, European-American; EU, European; HIS, Hispanic; OMRF, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation; UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles; USC, University of Southern California; UU, Uppsala University (Sweden).

Sestak et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2007 9:210   doi:10.1186/ar2176