Research article

Local hyperhemia to heating is impaired in secondary Raynaud's phenomenon

Aude Boignard^1,2, Muriel Salvat-Melis^1,2 , Patrick H Carpentier³, Christopher T Minson⁴, Laurent Grange⁵, Catherine Duc⁵, Françoise Sarrot-Reynauld⁶ and Jean-Luc Cracowski^1,2

¹  Laboratory HP2, EA 3745 Inserm ESPRI, Grenoble Medical School, France

²  Inserm Clinical Research Center 03, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France

³  Vascular Medicine Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France

⁴  Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA

⁵  Department of Rheumatology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France

⁶  Internal Medicine Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France

author email corresponding author email

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2005, 7:R1103-R1112doi:10.1186/ar1785

Published:	19 July 2005

Abstract

Accurate and sensitive measurement techniques are a key issue in the quantification of the microvascular and endothelial dysfunction in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Thermal hyperhemia comprises two separate mechanisms: an initial peak that is axon reflex mediated; and a sustained plateau phase that is nitric oxide dependent. The main objective of our study was to test whether thermal hyperhemia in patients with SSc differed from that in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and healthy controls. In a first study, we enrolled 20 patients suffering from SSc, 20 patients with primary RP and 20 healthy volunteers. All subjects were in a fasting state. Post-occlusive hyperhemia, 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin challenge and thermal hyperhemia were performed using laser Doppler flowmetry on the distal pad of the third left finger. In a second study, thermal hyperhemia was performed in 10 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 10 patients with primary RP. The thermal hyperhemia was dramatically altered in terms of amplitude and kinetics in patients with SSc. Whereas 19 healthy volunteers and 18 patients with primary RP exhibited the classic response, including an initial peak within the first 10 minutes followed by a nadir and a second peak, this occurred only in four of the SSc patients (p < 0.0001). The 10 minutes thermal peak was 43.4 (23.2 to 63), 42.6 (31 to 80.7) and 27 (14.7 to 51.4) mV/mm Hg in the healthy volunteers, primary RP and SSc groups, respectively (p = 0.01), while the 44°C thermal peak was 43.1 (21.3 to 62.1), 42.6 (31.6 to 74.3) and 25.4 (15 to 52.4) mV/mm Hg, respectively (p = 0.01). Thermal hyperhemia was more sensitive and specific than post-occlusive hyperhemia for differentiating SSc from primary RP. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, thermal hyperhemia was also altered in terms of amplitude. Thermal hyperhemia is dramatically altered in patients with secondary RP in comparison with subjects with primary RP. Further studies are required to determine the mechanisms of this altered response, and whether it may provide additional information in a clinical setting.