Table 3 |
||||
|
Comparison of the expression of selected genes in two groups of patients with rheumatoid arthritisa |
||||
|
Candidate gene |
Group Ib |
Group IIb |
Q (%) |
Pc |
|
|
||||
|
A – Expressed at higher levels in group II than in group I |
||||
|
|
||||
|
CASP9 |
-0.029 ± 0.018 |
0.020 ± 0.014 |
0.25 |
<0.001 |
|
PIG11 |
-0.025 ± 0.021 |
0.024 ± 0.017 |
0.25 |
<0.001 |
|
CTSG |
-0.018 ± 0.024 |
0.031 ± 0.021 |
0.25 |
0.001 |
|
CSF2RB |
-0.020 ± 0.024 |
0.019 ± 0.021 |
0.61 |
0.006 |
|
TNFRSF1A |
-0.023 ± 0.029 |
0.015 ± 0.016 |
0.77 |
0.010 |
|
IL10RB |
-0.021 ± 0.027 |
0.017 ± 0.021 |
0.90 |
0.012 |
|
|
||||
|
B – Expressed at higher levels in group I than in group II |
||||
|
|
||||
|
FN1 |
0.023 ± 0.018 |
-0.030 ± 0.019 |
0.25 |
<0.001 |
|
B2M |
0.020 ± 0.023 |
-0.028 ± 0.022 |
0.25 |
0.001 |
|
SDC2 |
0.023 ± 0.024 |
-0.024 ± 0.021 |
0.25 |
0.001 |
|
CTSB |
0.006 ± 0.019 |
-0.036 ± 0.026 |
0.84 |
0.002 |
|
STAT1 |
0.021 ± 0.031 |
-0.020 ± 0.014 |
1.19 |
0.008 |
|
ITGB2 |
0.021 ± 0.025 |
-0.018 ± 0.023 |
1.51 |
0.008 |
|
IFNGR2 |
0.019 ± 0.026 |
-0.016 ± 0.026 |
3.28 |
0.022 |
|
|
||||
|
aStatistical analysis on microarray data was performed using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) method (see Materials and methods). Q, which is the lowest false discovery rate, was considered significant at less than 5%. It is similar to the familiar P value, but adapted to the analysis of a large number of genes. bMeans ± standard deviations for the group, using log-transformed and median-centered microarray data. cValues calculated by t-test. P <0.05 was considered significant. |
||||
|
Tsubaki et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2005 7:R825 doi:10.1186/ar1751 |
||||