Research article

Anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide are not equivalent as predictors of severe outcomes in patients with recent-onset polyarthritis

Gilles Boire¹ , Pierre Cossette² , Artur J de Brum-Fernandes¹ , Patrick Liang¹ , Théophile Niyonsenga³ , Zhijie J Zhou⁴ , Nathalie Carrier³ , Claude Daniel⁵ and Henri-A Ménard⁴

¹  Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

²  Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

³  Centre de recherches cliniques, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

⁴  Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

⁵  Laboratoire d'histocompatibilité, Université du Québec, INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Québec, Canada

author email corresponding author email

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2005, 7:R592-R603doi:10.1186/ar1719

Published:	17 March 2005

Abstract

The prognostic value of two antibodies targeting citrullinated antigens, anti-Sa and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), present at inclusion, was evaluated prospectively in a cohort of 165 consecutive patients with recent-onset or early polyarthritis (EPA) followed for up to 30 months. Patients were treated according to current Good Clinical Practice standards. Predefined outcomes were severe arthritis and persistent arthritis. At inclusion, a median of 3 months after disease onset, 133 (81%) patients fulfilled at least four American College of Rheumatology criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and 30 (18%) had erosive changes on radiographs of hands and feet. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were used in close to 80% of the patients at 30 months. Joint damage increased linearly over time, whereas disease activity declined markedly and remained low at each follow-up. Autoantibodies were identified in 76 (46%) patients: rheumatoid factor (RF) in 68 (41%), anti-CCP in 53 (33%), and anti-Sa in 46 (28%). All three antibodies were correlated, but anti-Sa antibodies best predicted severity at 18 and 30 months. RF and anti-CCP performed less well. For both outcomes, anti-Sa alone performed better than any combination of antibodies. The presence of any autoantibody identified about 50 to 60% of the patients with poor outcomes. In multivariate analysis, anti-Sa (odds ratio (OR) 8.83), the presence of erosions at inclusion (OR 3.47) and increasing age (OR 1.06/year) were significantly associated with severity, whereas RF and anti-CCP were not significant predictors. Persistent arthritis was present in up to 84% of patients; autoantibodies were specific but poorly sensitive predictors of this outcome. We conclude that assays for antibodies against citrullinated antigens differ in their ability to predict poorer outcomes in patients with EPA. In our EPA cohort treated in accordance with current standards, detection of anti-Sa but not of RF or anti-CCP antibodies, in combination with clinical and radiological variables present at the first encounter, allowed the identification of a subgroup of EPA patients suffering more rapid and more severe joint damage over 30 months.