Table 3 |
|||||||
|
Ratingsa according to the AGREE instrument of osteoarthritis treatment guidelines published within the past 5 years |
|||||||
| Rating of guidelines [reference] |
|||||||
| AGREE instrument used for rating |
|
||||||
| Canadian Consensus |
North of |
ADMMC OA |
|||||
| Domain |
Item |
Conference[11] |
England [12,13] |
[14,15,16] |
ICSI [17,18] |
EULAR [6] |
ACR [4,5] |
|
|
|||||||
| Scope and purpose |
|||||||
| 1. Overall objective(s) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| 2. Clinical question(s) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
-b |
|
| 3. Target patient population |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| Stakeholder involvement |
|||||||
| 4. Development group representative |
+b |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
|
| 5. Patient views and preferences |
+ |
- |
-b |
- |
- |
+ |
|
| Rigour of development |
|||||||
| 6. Systematic evidence search |
- |
+ |
-b |
- |
+ |
- |
|
| 7. Selection of evidence explicit |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
|
| 8. Formulation of recommendations explicit |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
| 9. Benefits, side effects, and risks described |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+b |
+ |
+ |
|
| 10. Explicit link between evidence and recommendations |
+b |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| 11. External review |
+ |
+ |
+ |
-b |
- |
- |
|
| 12. Procedure for updating guideline |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| Clarity and presentation |
|||||||
| 13. Specific and unambiguous recommendations |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+b |
|
| 14. Different treatment options |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| 15. Key recommendations easily identified |
-b |
+ |
+ |
+b |
+ |
+b |
|
| Applicability |
|||||||
| 16. End users of guideline stated |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
-b |
- |
|
| 17. Barriers to implementation are discussed |
- |
- |
-b |
+ |
- |
- |
|
| 18. Cost implications are discussed |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
|
| 19. Tools for application |
- |
- |
-b |
+ |
- |
- |
|
| 20. Review/monitoring criteria defined |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
|
| 21. Pilot testing |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
| Editorial independence |
|||||||
| 22. Editorial independent from funding body |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| 23. Conflicts of interest are stated |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
aRatings on a 4-point scale (4 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree) have been dichotomized for purposes of clarity (see text): + indicates that the guideline has met the criterion; – indicates that it has not. bOne of the raters disagreed (see text). ADMMC = Algorithms for the Diagnosis and Management of Musculoskeletal Complaints; ACR = American College of Rheumatology; EULAR = European League Against Rheumatism; ICSI = Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. |
|||||||
|
Pencharz et al. Arthritis Res 2002 4:36 doi:10.1186/ar381 |
|||||||