Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Arthritis Research & Therapy and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Lupus 2012: New targets, new approaches

Meeting abstract

Variation in renal biopsy and medication prescribing practices among pediatric Medicaid patients with lupus nephritis prior to end-stage renal disease in the US, 2000 to 2004

LT Hiraki12*, CH Feldman2, J Liu2, GS Alarcón3, MA Fischer2, WC Winkelmayer4 and KH Costenbader2

  • * Corresponding author: LT Hiraki

Author Affiliations

1 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

2 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

3 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

4 Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012, 14(Suppl 3):A58  doi:10.1186/ar3992

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/S3/A58


Published:27 September 2012

© 2012 Hiraki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

Unequal medical care may contribute to striking sociodemographic disparities seen in outcomes for children with lupus nephritis. Medicaid is the US federal-state program providing health insurance to low-income children and parents. We investigated US nationwide variation in renal biopsies and medication prescriptions for children with lupus nephritis enrolled in Medicaid, 2000 to 2004, in the months preceding end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Methods

We identified all children aged 3 to <18 years with SLE (≥3 ICD-9 codes of 710.0, each >30 days apart) in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) from 2000 to 2004, which contains outpatient and inpatient Medicaid claims for enrollees in 47 US states and the District of Columbia. These data were linked to the US Renal Data System, with information on essentially all ESRD patients in the US, for the same years. We compared frequencies of renal biopsies, and prescription of corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and immunosuppressants (mycophenylate mofetil (MMF), cyclophosphamide (CYC), cyclosporine, azathioprine (AZA), tacrolimus), across categories of sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), US region of residence, residence in a designated Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA), and quartiles of pediatric rheumatologist number in state of residence. We tested for differences across categories using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, and applied the Cochrane Armitage test for trend.

Results

Of the 254 pediatric lupus nephritis patients who developed ESRD, the mean age was 14.2 (± 2.4) years; 72% were female, 61% were African American and 19% were Hispanic. The mean time from first SLE claim to ESRD was 3.8 (± 2.1) years. A total of 46% had at least one renal biopsy preceding ESRD. More children in the lower quartiles of SES and the higher quartiles of rheumatologist number per state, received a biopsy (P trend < 0.05) (Table 1). Ninety-one percent of children were prescribed steroids at some time preceding ESRD, 63% were prescribed HCQ and 66% any other immunosuppressant, 50% of whom were prescribed MMF, 30% AZA and 14% CYC. We observed variation in prescribed steroids across region of residence, HCQ and immunosuppressant across race (more non-White patients prescribed both medications), and a greater proportion of patients prescribed HCQ in states with a higher number of rheumatologists per state.

Table 1. Proportion of pediatric patients with lupus nephritis-associated ESRD who received renal biopsies and medications prior to ESRD

Conclusion

We observed significant differences in the proportion of children who had received renal biopsies across categories of SES and rheumatologist number per state, as well as marked differences in medication prescribing across categories race, SES, regions of residence and rheumatologist number in state of residence.