Table 1 |
||
|
challenges for imaging in gout |
||
|
Technique |
'Specific' feature |
Clinical potential |
|
|
||
|
X-ray |
Ankylosis |
Daily practice |
|
Osteosclerosis |
Long-term follow-up |
|
|
Osteophyte |
In epidemiology |
|
|
Periostal new bone |
In pathophysiology |
|
|
Spur |
In intervention study |
|
|
CT |
||
|
DECT |
Tophaceous load |
Experimental application |
|
In urate lowering therapies demonstrating efficacy |
||
|
HRCT |
Erosion-tophus interrelation |
Experimental application/sporadic in daily practice |
|
In pathophysiology |
||
|
US |
DCS/snow storm |
Common use in daily practice |
|
Power Doppler sign |
In diagnostic algorithm for early diagnosis (and possibly follow-up); measuring active inflammation |
|
|
MRI |
Bone oedema/osteitis |
Experimental application/daily practice |
|
In follow-up intervention study; measuring active inflammation |
||
|
|
||
|
CT, computerized tomography; DCS, double contour sign; DECT, dual energy CT; HRCT, high resolution CT; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound. |
||
|
Jansen Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012 14:126 doi:10.1186/ar4068 |
||