Table 5

Summary of substudy 2, hierarchical regression analyses: cross-lagged regressions for situational catastrophizing predicting cold pressor pain and cold pressor pain predicting situational catastrophizing

Step

Variable

R

Adjusted R²

R² Change

F Change

Standardized β

P-value

Δ CP Pain 2

1

Δ CP pain 1

0.23

0.01

0.05

1.34

-0.15

0.31

Δ S cat 2

0.18

0.20

2

Δ S cat 1

0.41

0.12

0.12

6.51*

0.35

0.014

Δ State Cat 2

1

Δ S cat 1

0.19

-0.01

0.04

0.87

0.06

0.72

Δ CP pain 2

0.16

0.29

2

Δ CP pain 1

0.19

-0.03

0.002

0.07

0.04

0.79

* P < 0.05. Δ S cat 1, Pre-to-Post state catastrophizing change; Δ S cat 2, Post-to-follow-up (FU) state catastrophizing change; Δ CP pain 1, Pre-to-Post cold pressor change; Δ CP pain 2, Post-to-FU cold pressor pain change.

Campbell et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012 14:R231   doi:10.1186/ar4073