Table 1 |
|||
|
Scan/Reader Scheme. |
|||
|
Site |
Scan |
Ultrasonographer |
Reader |
|
|
|||
|
1 (KIR) |
1 |
1 (MS) |
1 (MS) |
|
2 (SK) |
|||
|
2 |
2 (SK) |
2 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
2 (B&L) |
1 |
2 (SK) |
2 (SK) |
|
1 (MS) |
|||
|
2 |
1 (MS) |
1 |
|
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|||
|
Within scan inter-reader reproducibility is obtained by comparing scan 1values across the two readers. Parallel scan intra-reader reproducibility is obtained by comparing scan 1 read by the first reader and scan 3 read by the first reader. Parallel scan inter-reader reproducibility is obtained by comparing scan 1 read by the first reader and scan 2 read by the second reader. The scans acquired and read by the site ultrasonographer-reader (indicated in italics) were used to calculate treatment effects. KIR: Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology and B&L: St Bartholomew's and the London NHS Trust. MS based at KIR travelled to B&L for the subjects' Day 1 and Day 15 imaging and vice versa for SK who was based at B&L. |
|||
|
Seymour et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012 14:R198 doi:10.1186/ar4034 |
|||