|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 6.
Differential diagnosis among patients with arthritis and concomitant hepatitis C virus
infection, and therapeutic strategies. Clinico-serological and virological work-up is mandatory in patients presenting
with chronic arthritis. Patients with polyarthritis and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
can be classified as either having simple comorbidity, that is, HCV infection and
rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or other forms of chronic arthritis, or having HCV-associated
arthritis. This latter may represent one extrahepatic manifestation of HCV infection
or it can be a symptom of MCs. The comorbidity may be treated with the standard therapeutic
strategies for RA, with some precautions because of concomitant viral infection, in
particular for methotrexate and leflunomide. On the contrary, biologics (anti-TNFα
and anti-CD20 rituximab) have been usefully employed without significant side effects
in HCV-positive RA patients. The antiviral therapy of IFNα plus ribavirin (RIBA) can
also be employed after careful hepatologic evaluation of patients. Interestingly,
anti-TNFα, rituximab, and cyclosporine A seem to have a potential synergistic effect
if associated with antiviral treatment (IFNα + RIBA). Usually, HCV-associated arthritis
is poorly aggressive and may respond to low doses of steroids and hydroxychloroquine
(HCQ). The use of other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) presents the
above-mentioned limitations, while rituximab may be usefully employed, especially
in patients with more aggressive arthritis. Finally, rituximab may represent the first-choice
treatment in patients with arthritis in the setting of MCs. Ab, antibody; CCP, cyclic
citrullinated peptide; RF, rheumatoid factor.
Ferri et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012 14:215 doi:10.1186/ar3865 |