Table 5 |
|||||||||
|
Results for secondary outcomes: TUG, quadriceps, hamstring strength and knee joint range of motiona |
|||||||||
|
Variable |
OAK and control preinterventionb |
OAK |
Control |
Difference in change between groups |
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
8 weeks |
6 months |
8 weeks |
6 months |
Preintervention to 8 weeks |
95% CI |
Preintervention to 6 months |
95% CI |
||
|
|
|||||||||
|
TUG (score)c |
12 (0) |
10 (0.2) |
10 (0.2) |
11 (0.2) |
11 (0.2) |
-1.3 |
-1.81 to -0.86 |
-0.72 |
-1.35 to -0.08 |
|
Muscle Strength (kg) |
|||||||||
|
Left quadriceps |
18.9 (0) |
20.3 (0.5) |
19.6 (0.7) |
18.6 (0.5) |
18.1 (0.7) |
1.65 |
0.34 to 2.95 |
1.58 |
-0.31 to 3.47 |
|
Right quadriceps |
18.0 (0) |
19.6 (0.5) |
18.9 (0.7) |
17.8 (0.5) |
18.2 (0.7) |
1.79 |
0.33 to 3.24 |
0.66 |
-1.37 to 2.69 |
|
Left hamstringc |
8.0 (0) |
10.1 (0.3) |
9.5 (0.4) |
8.6 (0.3) |
8.79 (0.4) |
1.47 |
0.63 to 2.30 |
0.74 |
-0.31 to 1.79 |
|
Right hamstringc |
7.6 (0) |
10.2 (0.3) |
9.8 (0.4) |
8.4 (0.3) |
8.7 (0.4) |
1.80 |
0.89 to 2.70 |
1.18 |
0.06 to 2.29 |
|
Range of motion (°) |
|||||||||
|
Left knee flexionc |
125 (0) |
126 (0.8) |
126 (0.9) |
123 (0.8) |
123 (0.9) |
2.80 |
0.58 to 5.02 |
2.26 |
-0.32 to 4.86 |
|
Right knee flexion |
123 (0) |
123 (0.9) |
121 (0.9) |
121 (0.9) |
121 (0.9) |
1.56 |
-0.90 to 4.02 |
0.02 |
-2.53 to 2.57 |
|
Left knee extensionc |
-4 (0) |
-4 (0.3) |
-4 (0.5) |
-4 (0.3) |
-3 (0.5) |
0.1 |
-0.72 to 0.88 |
-1.39 |
-2.71 to -0.06 |
|
Right knee extensionc |
-4 (0) |
-4 (0.3) |
-5 (0.5) |
-5 (0.3) |
-3 (0.5) |
0.9 |
-0.03 to 1.78 |
-1.18 |
-2.63 to 0.26 |
|
|
|||||||||
|
aOAK: Osteoarthritis of the Knee Self-Management Program; TUG: Timed Up & Go Test. bPreintervention values were the same in both groups when the baseline value was used as a covariate. cP < 0.05. Preintervention (baseline), postintervention (8 weeks) and 6-month values were calculated using repeated-measures analysis of covariance with the baseline value of the dependent variable as the covariate. Data are estimated marginal means (SEM) with the mean (95% CI) difference in changes between the groups at each time point. |
|||||||||
|
Coleman et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012 14:R21 doi:10.1186/ar3703 |
|||||||||