Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Arthritis Research & Therapy and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Can anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody-negative RA be subdivided into clinical subphenotypes?

Diederik PC De Rooy1*, Annemiek Willemze2, Bart Mertens1, Tom WJ Huizinga1 and Annette HM Van der Helm-van Mil1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

2 Department of Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2011, 13:R180  doi:10.1186/ar3505

Published: 27 October 2011

Abstract

Introduction

Studies investigating genetic risk factors for susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) studied anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (CCP)-positive RA more frequently than anti-CCP-negative RA. One of the reasons for this is the perception that anti-CCP-negative RA may include patients that fulfilled criteria for RA but belong to a wide range of diagnoses. We aimed to evaluate the validity of this notion and explored whether clinical subphenotypes can be discerned within anti-CCP-negative RA.

Methods

The 318 patients with anti-CCP-negative RA (1987 ACR criteria), included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic between 1993 and 2006, were studied for baseline characteristics and radiologic progression data during a mean follow-up of 5 years. Grouping was studied both at variable and patient levels. Principal components analysis and partial least-squares regression were applied to study for clustering of variables. A cluster analysis was performed to look for clustering of patients.

Results

The simultaneous presence of patient characteristics at disease presentation was observed for several groups; however, the three largest groups of patients' characteristics explained only 26.5% of the total variance. Plotting the contribution of each patient to these three groups did not reveal clustering of patients. Comparable observations were made when data on progression of joint destruction were studied in relation to baseline clinical data. A cluster analysis, evaluating whether patients resemble each other, revealed no grouping of patients. Altogether, no clinically distinguishable subphenotypes were observed.

Conclusions

The current data provide evidence that, for risk-factor studies, anti-CCP-negative RA patients can be studied as one group.