Letter

Response to: Comparison of laser Doppler imaging, fingertip lacticemy test, and nailfold capillaroscopy for assessment of digital microcirculation in systemic sclerosis

Alberto Sulli1, Vanessa Smith2 and Maurizio Cutolo1*

Author Affiliations

1 Research Laboratory and Academic Unit of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132 Genova, Italy

2 Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium

For all author emails, please log on.

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2011, 13:301 doi:10.1186/ar3201


See related research by Correa et al., http://arthritis-research.com/content/12/4/R157 and related letter by Correa et al., http://arthritis-research.com/content/13/1/302

Published: 24 January 2011

First paragraph (this article has no abstract)

We read with interest the article by Correa and colleagues [1] in a recent issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy: 'Comparison of laser Doppler imaging, fingertip lacticemy test, and nailfold capillaroscopy for assessment of digital microcirculation in systemic sclerosis'.