Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Arthritis Research & Therapy and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems

Julia Freise1*, Iris Bernau2, Sabine Meier3, Henning Zeidler4 and Jens G Kuipers5

Author affiliations

1 Division of Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany

2 Division of Anaesthesiology, Diako Hospital, Gröpelinger Heerstraße 406 - 408, Bremen, 28239, Germany

3 Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Straße. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany

4 Rheumatologikum, Rathenau-Straße 13-14, Hannover, 30159, Germany

5 Division of Rheumatology, Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus, St.-Pauli-Deich 24, Bremen, 28199, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2009, 11:R175  doi:10.1186/ar2864

Published: 21 November 2009

Abstract

Introduction

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are used in research for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. tr.) in synovial fluid (SF). However there is no standardized system for diagnostic use in clinical practice, therefore this study aimed at determining the molecular biology method best suited to detect C. tr. from SF.

Methods

SF samples were spiked with C. tr. elementary bodies (EB) and human peripheral blood monocytes (PBMo) persistently infected with C. tr. in vitro to evaluate the sensitivity of different molecular biology methods and assays. Five different DNA-extraction methods were tested: 1) Alkaline lysis, 2) QIAex II Gel Extraction Kit®+ CTAB, 3) Chelex®-extraction, 4) QIAmp Tissue Kit® and 5) QIAmp DNA Stool Kit®. All DNA extracts were subjected to 5 different DNA amplification systems to detect C. tr.- DNA in the spiked SF samples: two C. tr. -omp1-- directed PCR, one C. tr.-plasmid-PCR, one C. tr. -16s RNA directed PCR, and one commercially available LCR (LCX®, Abbott laboratories).

Results

In SF samples spiked with C. tr.-EB and with C. tr.-PBMo, alkaline lysis, detecting 1 C. tr.-EB/ml SF, 0,1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml SF and QIAmp gel extraction kit®+ CTAB detecting 0,1 C. tr. -EB/ml SF, 1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml, respectively, allowed most sensitive detection of the organism in combination with the C. tr.- omp1-(152 bp) PCR. Sensitivity decreased in all methods after storage of the DNA of C. tr.- dilution series at -20°C for 4 months by at least one log phase.

Conclusions

The sensitivity to detect C. tr.- DNA from SF is highly dependent on the DNA extraction method and the detection system applied. Alkaline lysis as well as the QIAmp Gel extraction kit® + CTAB in combination with C. tr.- omp1 - (152 bp) PCR evolved as the most sensitive methods to identify C. tr. in serial dilutions.