Table 4 |
||||||||
|
Models using clinical, radiological and DXA variables |
||||||||
|
Variables |
% Diff. & p |
-2 Log |
R2 |
AIC |
AUC |
TNR |
TPR |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
1 |
KL score affected side: |
30.7% (***) |
159.5 |
0.31 |
163.5 |
0.76 |
93.2 |
37.2 |
|
2 |
DXA affected side: |
184.2 |
0.15 |
192.2 |
0.69 |
97.3 |
9.3 |
|
|
- BMC medial part femoral head |
13.9% (***) |
|||||||
|
- BMC inferior part femoral head |
7.2% (***) |
|||||||
|
- BMC femoral neck |
5%(*) |
|||||||
|
3 |
DXA affected side + KL: |
148.6 |
0.38 |
158.6 |
0.83 |
93.9 |
34.9 |
|
|
- BMC medial part femoral head |
13.9%(*) |
|||||||
|
- BMC inferior part femoral head |
7.2%(*) |
|||||||
|
- BMC femoral neck |
5%(**) |
|||||||
|
- KL affected side |
NA(***) |
|||||||
|
4 |
KL affected side + Delta KL |
154.0 |
0.35 |
160 |
0.82 |
93.9 |
34.9 |
|
|
- KL score affected side |
NA(***) |
|||||||
|
- Delta KL |
32%(*) |
|||||||
|
5 |
DXA ROI'S difference: |
135.6 |
0.45 |
153.6 |
0.84 |
91.7 |
51.2 |
|
|
- Difference superior area fem head |
16.5% (*) |
|||||||
|
- Difference trochanteric area size |
2% (*) |
|||||||
|
- Difference BMD sup. part fem. head |
5.7% (**) |
|||||||
|
- Difference BMC sup. part fem. head |
9% (**) |
|||||||
|
- Difference BMD med. part fem. head |
4.6% (**) |
|||||||
|
- Difference BMC med. part fem. head |
4% (**) |
|||||||
|
- Difference Intertrochanteric area size |
-4.5% (*) |
|||||||
|
- KL score affected side |
NA(***) |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
The difference in values between affected hip and contralateral side is expressed in percentage (%). Positive values represent an increase in the affected hip. No applicable (NA) in the cases that the variable only reflect the affected side. Level of significance codes: '***' P value < 0.001, '**' P value < 0.01, '*' P value < 0.05. All models were corrected for patient characteristics. TPR and TNR columns correspond to the percentage correctly predicted by the models. *Area under the curve value obtained after 10-fold cross validation process. AIC = An Information Criterion; AUC = areas under the curve; DXA = dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; KL = Kellgren and Lawrence score of the affected side; ROI = rate opf interest; TNR = true negative rate TPR = true positive rate |
||||||||
|
CastaƱo Betancourt et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2009 11:R162 doi:10.1186/ar2845 |
||||||||