|
Sensitivity analyses by treatment group |
||
| Manipulation of variables |
Incremental cost versus usual care per person (€) |
Cost utility ratioa (€/QALY) |
|
|
||
| Health system analysis: |
||
| Number of participants per pool session: |
||
| 30% lower (10 patients/group) |
773 |
5,900 |
| 30% higher (20 patients/group) |
389 |
2,969 |
| Salary of personnel: |
||
| 30% lower (monitor and nurse) |
479 |
3,656 |
| 30% higher (monitor and nurse) |
554 |
4,229 |
| No additional salary of nurse |
465 |
3,550 |
| Best case scenario of salary, participation and effectivenessb |
348 |
1,200 |
| Worst case scenario of salary, participation and effectivenessv |
830 |
75,455 |
| Societal analysis: |
||
| Number of participants per pool session: |
||
| 30% lower (10 patients/group) |
1,288 |
9,832 |
| 30% higher (20 patients/group) |
904 |
6,901 |
| Salary of personnel: |
||
| 30% lower (monitor and nurse) |
994 |
7,588 |
| 30% higher (monitor and nurse) |
1,069 |
8,160 |
| No additional salary of nurse |
980 |
7,481 |
| Distance to facilities per session: |
||
| Near (without bus ticket and 1.5 h spent) |
831 |
6,344 |
| Far (4 bus ticket and 2.5 h spent) |
1,442 |
11,008 |
| Best case scenario of salary, participation, effectiveness and nearb |
662 |
2,283 |
| Worst case scenario of salary, participation, effectiveness and farc |
1,755 |
159,545 |
|
QALY, quality adjusted life year. aFrom the Spanish Health System, the cost-utility ratio threshold was set at € 23,153/QALY for 8 months in 2005; bpool rental + participation 20 persons per group + QALY differential at higher limit of 95% confidence interval; csalary 30% higher (monitor and nurse) + participation 10 persons per group + QALY differential at lower limit of 95% confidence interval. | ||
Gusi and Tomas-Carus Arthritis Research & Therapy 2008 10:R24 doi:10.1186/ar2377 |
||